Daniel

Sorry, but no. This is not implemented in this software. A quote from the Invision Product Manager: So it seems unlikely that we will see this feature anytime soon. I understand that you miss the "good old nntp". But there is not much I could do right now. Honestly, the demand for this feature is not that big.

Exactly. And this is what he describes in his blog.

Ah grumpy Alek - it's you again ... . I knew I remember that harsh sound from somewhere. What is so hard about being constructive and positive?

🧑🌴 ... ? 😂

Hi there, some of you wanted to ignore specific topics. Well - we are testing this functionality right now. Next to the button "Reply to this topic" you find a new link "Ignore this topic": If you ignore a topic, it will not be listed in any activity-streams. But it will still be included in search-results. An ignored topic is marked with a badge: If you want to "un-ignore" a topic, you will find a link for this: You can manage your ignored topics in your account.settings: For now this should work. Please consider this function more as a "mute topic for _X_ days". Because of the architecture of this plugin, it will not be able to handle hundreds or thousands of ignored topics. So there will be some sort of cleanup - but this part is not active yet. Butf this should be acceptable for us, because older topics will not get that much new content - so they will not disturb you anyway. Let's see how it works. 🙂

Technically we could include any graphic there, but negative reactions will not be implemented here.

Alek, I really don’t understand your intentions. You obviously have your opinion and that’s okay - but you are not allowing other points of view without insulting other members of this community. Stop this now. As long as you act this way, we cannot discuss with each other (read: with you). Rudy - sometimes a discussion must stop when we realize that it will lead to nowhere. Especially in a web-forum with a linear discussion-thread. The tree-based layout of a usenet-group allowed yo to discuss side-aspects for ever. But here this style just captures a whole thread.

For unread content there is a feed: https://en.delphipraxis.net/discover/unread/ For other notifications you should check your profile: https://en.delphipraxis.net/notifications/options/

The limit is set to 10 reactions per day. The default value from this software. I would not mind to raise this value. //edit: Now it is 100 per day.

You can still manage your personal list of ignored topics in your account-settings.

Yes, this is because this plugin only affects the activity-streams. So you‘d suggest to completely hide an ignored topic in any forum- or topic-listings?

It is pretty obvious that you do not care. You should care because this is a public forum, not just yours. Now we have told you several times to move your specific discussions about technical details of the Delphi-language to a separate thread. Most of these posts are offtopic now. You did not care at all. Do I really have to explain to you why it is important for us to stay on a topic? It is not that complicated. If any other person wants find find some information later, they will look for the thread-title to decide for reading a topic or not. This „let us talk about everything“-threads do not help anyone.

Technically yes - but I’d prefer a common agreement to slow down here.

Okay, we will stop the discussion here. You are now discussing so many different topics here that this discussion will not come to a meaningful end. Nearly each and every technical aspect from the Delphi-language can be seen as "somewhat related to the compiler" but this is not the way we define topics here. This might have worked more or less in the old nntp-usenet, but not in a linear web-based forum. So we really have to stop here unless there are really new aspects about open-sourcing the compiler (e.g. the announcement from Embarcadero that they did this...) //edit: Feel free to open another thread to discuss a specific technical topic like ARC or AnsiStrings or ... but please do not squeeze different discussions into a single topic here.

Alex, please sit back and relax. Your message is clear, and repeating and repeating this link to QP will not change anything. Even if this thread would have 100 pages, a thread here in this forum will not reach the decision-makers. There is an Embarcadero community for this - I leave it up to you to find out how “boring” they are over there.

Not yet, but it‘s near.

Feel free to disagree to each other, but you must stop discussing about politics here. Reason is simple - it takes just too much time to moderate these discussions as they tend to get out of control very quickly. And honestly - you did not clarify anything. You just accused him to be misinformed. But let me be clear: Please do not try to clarify anything about the political aspects of this thread. This will get too far offtopic. If there is really some clearly false information I am sorry for this.

We are on page #4 because of a lot of off-topic. Also issues of newpascal are a separate topic - might be off topic also in a delphi-related community like this. And I will clearly not vote for this request.

Please come back to the original topic. We startet with the Delphi-compiler and ended with WWII. 😕

Absolutely. But I tend to start with one single sub-forum for the TurboPower-components. When we come to a point that we have too many posts in there, we should go some steps further.

There ist also "Activity" > "Search" from the menu.

I have moved the discussion about the TStringHelper into a separate topic: https://en.delphipraxis.net/topic/738-mis-behaviour-of-tstringhelper/

I can reproduce it for the name of the label, but not for the caption, for example. (10.3.1)

"inline.gif" is a graphic from our german-speaking forum. its occurrence here is a copy&paste-error. 😉 I now have disabled the announcement - most of you are now aware of the update.

Is it the right binary? Looks like the previous one. (2.264.576 bytes, exe-date is 12-jan-2019)