Anders Melander

You don't have to install anything but you could at least read the documentation and examine the examples...

Completely OT but in Denmark every citizen has a personal certificate issued by the state for verification of online identity etc. This was introduced 20 years or so ago. In theory this certificate can be used for code signing (and I used to do so) but about ten years back the state outsourced the whole operation, implementation and infrastructure, to a private company (Nets DanID) which then introduced a solution called NemID (rimes with GlemID and SlemID = ForgetID and BadID). NemID is still based on certificates but it's so idiotically implemented that both the public and private keys are stored on the Nets servers. In other words: I don't have access to my own private keys and I have no control over who has access to them. Sorry. I get really pissed off every time someone mentions certificates 🙂

New version released: v1.0.7271.54299 http://melander.dk/download/amTranslationManagerInstall-1.0.7271.54299.exe Changes since v1.0.7254.4932 New features: GNU GetText PO file import. Improvements: Copy to clipboard not uses tab delimited CSV for better integration with Excel. Normalization rules can now be configured. New validation rules: pipe | and surround ()[]{}<> mismatch. Validation warnings can now be dismissed and resolved. New equalization rules: Leading space and Trailing space. Duplicates in Translation Memory lookup results are now ranked by the similarity of the translation source to the value being looked up. Other: Installation of the command line tool is now optional. Primarily because it is currently being flagged as a false positive by several virus checkers. Removed dependency on midas.dll A slew of performance and usability improvements and bug fixes. Thank you to all those that have sent me suggestions, feedback and bug reports.

https://www.sourcetrail.com/blog/open_source/ Also Wow. Bold move and I hope it turns out good for them. I can't help but think of Borland who went for the exact opposite solution (remember Inprise?) and almost killed Delphi in the process. And we're still paying the price for that fiasco - literally.

You need to examine the call stack of all the threads. When you break the call stack is just shown for the currently active thread which is rarely the one you're interested in. P.S. I can see from your video that you have DropBox installed...

If you can reproduce the problem then simply run the application in the debugger, break when the problem occurs and examine the callstacks. ...however; My usual advice when people experience this kind of progressive or periodic slowdown/lockup is to uninstall the various cloud storage services they have running (ITunes, Google Drive, OneDrive, etc.). Solves the problem in 9 out of 10 cases.

I've been using it since the first version (which AFAIR was before XE) with no major problems. Maybe because my style is pretty standard (aka the One True Style ). One thing I've never gotten to work though is formatting a block of text: It always formats the whole file. No biggie. It's usually the first step I do when I'm brought in to fix other peoples code.

To paraphrase David Heffernan: That is utter nonsense and it doesn't appear that your Professor Lee has much practical knowledge about how to work safely with threads. Or maybe he's just using hyperbole to get a point across. Under any circumstances, Quoting academia? To disprove the opinions of a professional, highly skilled and experienced developer? Really? How about some arguments based on your own knowledge and experience... Many of us use threads on a daily basis and do so without wreaking havoc in the universe. If you understand the pitfalls of multi threading, know how to protect your resources, synchronize execution, understand race conditions, etc. etc., then threads are just another tool in the box. If you don't understand threading then yes, it will hurt you in a gazzilion ways you literally (and I use that word in the European sense) didn't think possible.

Actually it might. One of my grieves with the Refactor menu item is that if you accidentally move the mouse over the menu item (e.g. on the way to the View or Project menu item) then there's a noticeable delay (very noticeable on low end systems) as the IDE loads the refactor stuff (among it the J# run time I suspect) in order to populate the sub menu. Agree, but I don't think I'll have more to contribute on the subject.

Yes but that also removes the stuff I use and which actually works (mostly): "Find References" and "Rename".

Oh... This is the GExperts sub forum... I didn't notice that so I actually thought you meant the IDE main menu (which is what I was talking about). Well then, pls ignore what I said.

They can start by getting rid of the Refactor menu - and that might also improve the stability of the IDE.

Then the thread will be killed when the application terminates. The point is that it's better to forget about the thread, report a timeout and continue as if the thread had been forcefully terminated. Of course if the thread has allocated or is blocking resources then that solution might not work.

I'm assuming the above is just an example to explain what you need - since if you can kill the thread from within the thread, then the thread isn't frozen and you could just exit it the normal way. I completely agree. Just don't do it. What you could do is signal the thread (use an event, a boolean, whatever) that it has become thread-non-grata and then just forget about it. If the blocking call ever returns then your thread can check the signal and terminate. E.g. something like this in your TThread.Execute procedure TMyThread.Execute; begin while (not Terminated) do begin CallStuffThatMightBlockForever; if (FNotInterestedAnymore) then break; end; end;

Additionally, RegSaveKey doesn't save in .reg format but in registry hive format. There is no API for saving in .reg format.

I'm afraid I can't answer that. Supposedly there used to be a registry key that could do the trick (HKCU\Software\Embarcadero\BDS\19.0\FormDesign\DefaultFont) but that didn't work with the embedded form designer and as far as I can tell it no longer work with the detached designer either. I guess you could create an IDE plugin that modifies the form designer but that's probably more work than it's worth. Maybe just a design time package that modifies Application.DefaultFont like above will do the trick, but that will affect the whole IDE. FWIW I understand the OCD in you that wants the form to use SegoeUI at design time but it shouldn't really matter. If you have designed it "properly" then the form should be able to display correctly with both SegoeUI and Tahoma. After all you don't know what font the end-user will be using.

I guess it's a matter of perspective. If you didn't expect the thread to start until after the constructor then I can see how the behavior would be seen as a bug. I never expected it to behave any other way so to me it was just an annoyance. A bit like FreeOnTerminate. A pretty good way to shoot one self in the foot.

That must have been around the time when I stopped reading the documentation 🙂 I can't see why it would be classed as a bug though.

Oh... You're right. It's even documented: I think I'll continue to use the create-suspended pattern anyway since it explicitly does what I wish.

I know that this isn't really what you're asking but I don't think I've ever had a case where one didn't need to create suspended. You always have to either pass some information to the thread or initialize it's data and if you don't create it suspended there will be a race between the creator and the thread for access to the thread data structures. For example: type TMyThread = class(TThread) private FData: TSomeType; protected procedure Execute; override; public construtor Create(const AValue: TSomeType); end; construtor TMyThread.Create(const AValue: TSomeType); begin inherited Create(False); // Thread starts immediately FData := AValue; // Race condition here end; procedure TMyThread.Execute; begin FData.WhatEver; // Race condition here end; var Thread: TMyThread; begin Thread := TMyThread.Create(SomeData); end;

@Vandrovnik A new version with the Duplicate View is now available: http://melander.dk/download/amTranslationManagerInstall-1.0.7254.4932.exe I had a bit of trouble getting this version up as BitDefender kept insisting that amResourceModuleBuilder.exe contained the Gen:Variant.DCry.1 ransomware. In the end I had to simply include the previous version of that file instead. Description of the Duplicate View above. I have also included the "Locate in TM action: As the hint says, the action attempts to locate the focused source/target pair. It tries to be a bit intelligent about it in case there are multiple candidates (due to sanitation/equalization) so it will give priority to exact matches, case insensitive matches, sanitized matches and equalized matches, in that order. If a match is found the TM is opened and the matching row is selected: This version also includes Copy to clipboard (as CSV) and Save to CSV. Next up is Paste and Import from CSV.

Done. The action performed on values to check for equality isn't called equalization though. It's called normalization. Internally, in the source, I call it Sanitation (i.e. I remove all the junk). Anyway, here's what I have implemented: The "duplicate view" is invoked via the popup menu: When viewing duplicates a new column is added. This column displays the sanitized value of the selected language. You can control what sanitation rules to apply. Only rows that have duplicate values are displayed in duplicate view. In case you wonder why I'm not grouping on the Duplicate column; I tried it but found that it just cluttered the user interface and made the grid too cumbersome to navigate. I'll try to get a new version with these changes released tomorrow or Tuesday. I understand the problem. The dialog is already trying to communicate too much information and has become too complex for a standard message dialog. I have already redesigned it a bit (see below) but in order to add a "Replace" action I would have to switch to using a full blown Task Dialog or even better a custom dialog. That however will have to wait. I think the best I can do in the short term is to add a "Find in TM" action. This would open the TM, try to locate the currently focused Source/Target value pair and focus the target value in the TM.

In the project file (the DPR file) I do this before the first form is created: if (CheckWin32Version(6, 0)) then begin // Application.DefaultFont is the font used when TForm.ParentFont=True. // It is Tahoma by default but should be Segoe UI on Vista and later (according to MS UI guide lines). // See InitDefFontData() in graphics.pas Application.DefaultFont.Assign(Screen.MessageFont); // DefFontData.Name specifies the default font for everything that doesn't specify a specific font. // For now we leave it as is (Tahoma). At some point it should follow the system default like above: // DefFontData.Name := Screen.MessageFont.Name; end; And then I just make sure to set all forms ParentFont=True at design time.

Nope. A deck is model, data, state and maybe presentation. The game is logic. A game is not a deck. A game uses a deck. Really basic OOP since we're going there. Why stop there? What about layers, filters, transformations, scanner and cloud support. Yes, let's add SOAP, REST, FTP and Kermit support in case need to transfer these images between systems. Why do we need different classes at all? We could just create a single class that does EVERYTHING. You're confusing high level ease of use with low level architecture. The difference between the VCL and f.ex. ImageMagic is that one of them has it and the other doesn't. I'm guessing you've never read through the ImageMagick source code since you use it as a reference. I have. It's written in C. That might give you an idea of the inheritance scheme it uses... No? There's really no point in me trying to explain my point further since our reference frames are obviously worlds apart. Good night and good luck.

Monolithic design... Pick up any book on software design and it will explain why that is not a good idea. I'm not going to do it here. Unnecessary coupling. The above book will explain that too, but ask instead: Why should it? Make a toolbox of individual tools that does as little as possible as good as possible and then assemble them into something larger. A swiss army knife is good to have if you're stranded on a deserted island. Besides that it's only good for impressing your 7 year old friends. Anyway, we're hijacking Foersom's thread. I'm outta here.