Kyle_Katarn31

Thanks, i'll check this !

Hello, I'm using TsslHttpCli to connect from my app to my servers. What's the method to be used to check on client side if TLS 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 is being used ? Thanks !

My mistake, already reported here :

OverbyteIcsFileCopy.pas Line 1583 and 1584 : IgnorePathList.Delimiter, '"' + IgnorePathList.Delimiter + '"', [rfReplaceAll]) + '"'; { V8.63 for D7 } IgnorePathList.DelimitedText := '"' + StringReplace(AnsiLowerCase(FIgnorePaths), does not compile (obviously wrong) with Delphi 7

Works fine, thanks !

http://wiki.overbyte.eu/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download seems down on my end.... do you confirm ?

Thanks "This won't matter for much longer since the next major release of ICS will cease support for compilers more than a few years old" You mean that you are about to drop Delphi 7 support ? What a bad news !

No, never seen this but very often this kind of exception are "hidden" by Windows....

Not possible. Random exception while running for a long time in ReactOs (far from my IDE)

MaxInt or expected length to be copied (Length()-xxx)

Exception : (dll/win32/kernel32/client/except.c:735) Delphi Exception at address: 0049F658 (dll/win32/kernel32/client/except.c:736) Exception-Object: 009CB4C4 (dll/win32/kernel32/client/except.c:737) Exception text: 955cb0 MAP file : 049F09C:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}constructor TCustomSmtpClient.Create(AOwner:TComponent); 049F2F8:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}destructor TCustomSmtpClient.Destroy; 049F398:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F398(?:?; ?:?); 049F400:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F400; 049F410:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F410; 049F44C:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F44C; 049F488:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F488(?:?); 049F51C:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F51C(?:?); 049F5A8:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F5A8(?:?); 049F5D0:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}function sub_0049F5D0(?:?; ?:?):?; 049F634:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F634(?:TCustomSmtpClient); 049F680:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F680; 049F6A0:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F6A0(?:?); 049F6C0:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F6C0(?:?); 049F6E0:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F6E0(?:?); 049F780:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F780(?:TCustomSmtpClient; ?:?); 049F7A0:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F7A0(?:?); 049F7FC:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049F7FC(?:?); 049FA30:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049FA30(?:?; ?:?); 049FE08:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049FE08(?:?); 049FED8:{OverbyteIcsSmtpProt}procedure sub_0049FED8(?:TCustomSmtpClient; ?:?; ?:AnsiString; ?:?; ?:?; ?:?; ?:?);

Then argument to be filled with actual needed length

Any clue or comment?

Just a comment. No problem. My problem is on the assert in the other thread

Ok. So at least the Copy enhancement to be considered ?