DelphiUdIT

I never used this protocol. I always used the library (a DLL normally, a simple UDP/TCP packets or RS485 comm functions) from the vendor, but I haven't worked with RFID for a while.

I'm reopening this discussion because Embarcadero has released the new version of WINMD. It seems they've done something (for example, as suggested, they've internally added a reference to their WINAPI.WINDOWS). They also have add some new units. Some things like those reported in this QP (https://embt.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/RSS-1577) have been fixed (FALSE and TRUE, for example). BOOL remains an integer, while in WinAPI.Windows it's defined as a longbool (which should also be an integer, but in the documentation, it's expressed as an unsigned integer). I'll test to see if anything has actually changed... for the better.

@Oboba I didn't say that Win32 IDE, with which you can produce x86 EXE, will be abandoned in a near time. As I said (or better Embarcadero said), the 32-bit IDE will still be maintained, so you will not have any issue.

I think you must EDIT the property of the STYLE (Android light) that you use, not the Form property.

Have you tried with Styles and edit the StatusBar property of one of the styles that you use ?

I doubt it. Embarcadero has said it will maintain the 32-bit IDE for some time, and I think 32-bit application development will stop there. Many manufacturers no longer support 32-bit technology, so I doubt Embarcadero will invest in porting 32-bit application development to the new 64-bit IDE. Of course this is my personal feeling.

@Dave Novo As others have already said, if you're a professional programmer, you have to know the code you're using. This doesn't mean you have to read the entire VCL code... it just means that when you get a piece of code, wherever you get it, you have to take a look at it. And you have to read the accompanying documentation. Then there are trusted sources, such as those recommended by Embarcadero or the "products" of members of well-known forums. And you might not even glance at these sources, but you still have to read the documentation. You see, one of the current problems emerging with artificial intelligence is that many people with no programming experience are proposing solutions developed entirely by AI without even looking at the code... and perhaps without even running it. How is it possible to use (and propose) such code without knowing it? Now, however, much more attention is needed, and lastly, from a professional point of view, the new legislative regulations being released in Europe to regulate the software sector leave little room for doubt on this point.

For me is working, every time I insert or delete a char (with backspace or canc) the list is updated.

The .pas file only define the class a runtime, but the error indicate that is missing like design component from MainForm: this may be is an ActiveX component (.... is an ActiveX component). You must import like a component in the IDE Palette (using Menu Component / Import Component).

I tested the new paservers from Rad 13.0 with Linux (Ubuntu 16.04 and 22.04), Mac (very old OS) and Win64 ... all with VM of course and they worked. All Paservers were sending from IDE automatically in the scratch folder in the guest OS. P.S.: all PAServers were tested with simple applications with debug.

I tried some debugging, and it seems that inline variables are now handled better: they appear both in the "Local Variables" debug window and with the cursor over the variable. Be aware, however, that they only appear after the corresponding line has been executed.

Now the answer is right. It's improving

In today webinar they said that Konopka wil be released very soon ...

Uhmmm ... may be 11.59 is not the 23.59 (11.59 AM and 11.59 PM)

Why you assert that the code you are copying (or commited like you say) from an AI is not copyrighted ? You search in all github, gitlab, bitbucket, gdrive, azure and all other public repository to search for that piece of code ? No, it's simply because it's better for you to use it, ignoring any sources (which would most likely be impossible to find). But it's one thing if you produce code that's similar to existing code (and this obviously happens), but it's another thing entirely if you copy code from a third party (AI) who in turn copied it from who knows where. Anyway, I'll stop here, I'm already off topic.