DelphiUdIT

There are others variant of that function, with options to replace all occurrences and case sensitive or not. See https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/Athens/en/System.SysUtils.StringReplace for details.

For this I have no suggestions .... seems that something about server configuration (SAN reference of certificate wrong or with *) but i have not experience with this. You can try this: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/ to verify the site (they expose the anomalies). Bye

If the KeyFile not has any password, then event will not be trigger, but if you use a certificate you must use also the keyfile. The error you'll refer here is the original (EIdOSSLLoadingKeyError with message: 'could not load key, check password. error: 0B080074:x509 certificate routines:X509_check_private_key:key values mismatch') ? May be the KeyFile and and Certificate don't match .... Also, suggestion for usage: don't use "Method" and "SSLVersions" of SSLIOHandler together, they override each others. Use only "SSLVersions".

Use a certificate with Http client is normally not needed, but If you must use it (like in authentication purpose) then you must use also use private key. (uncommented //IdSSLIOHandler.SSLOptions.KeyFile := 'privatekey.pem'; ) and in the GetPassword event write: procedure xxx.GetPassword(var Password: string); begin Password = YourPasswordForPrivateKey; end; The private key and the password of course will NOT be sent to server. Remember that the password should not hard coded in the executable, but should be ask to operator and used like a cache (expire with time or after N. use). Bye

This is like Wedgewood Light style works in a VCL project with the standard PageControl (I dont'have Raize component). There is not any issue. May be this is an issue of TrzPageControl, but should be see how the style is implemented in that control (or if some design properties of the control are set and incompatible with style).

I never use password with private key, but i think that you should use the OnGetPassword event of the IOSSLHandler that you use. Assign the correct value to "Password" parameter of the event. Bye

I don't know with Indy, but in Delphi there are the WinApi.IPHlpApi e WinAPi.IPTypes that are acquired from Project JEDI. You must enumerate the Interface cards and looks for properties: Uses WinAPi.IpHlpApi, WinApi.IpTypes; var NumInterfaces: Cardinal; AdapterInfo: array of TIpAdapterInfo; OutBufLen: ULONG; begin GetNumberOfInterfaces(NumInterfaces); SetLength(AdapterInfo, NumInterfaces); OutBufLen := NumInterfaces * SizeOf(TIpAdapterInfo); GetAdaptersInfo(@AdapterInfo[0], OutBufLen); for var i := 0 to NumInterfaces - 1 do begin (* These are the 6 bytes MAC Addresses of Interfaces AdapterInfo[i].Address[0], AdapterInfo[i].Address[1] AdapterInfo[i].Address[2], AdapterInfo[i].Address[3] AdapterInfo[i].Address[4], AdapterInfo[i].Address[5] *) end; end; EDIT: This works only in Windows platforms.

He must install the community edition which is incompatible with any other installed version. I don't know how the CE tests the presence of another product, but certainly by deleting that directory you remove traces of any other licenses (which in the new versions also affects AppData\.......\Embarcadero). As per your suggestion, he could make a copy to possibly keep the data.

TAKE CAREFULLY AND UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE DOING. WHAT I TELL YOU MAY DAMAGE WINDOWS INSTALLATION. DO IT AT YOUR RISK. All the paths are the standard paths, verify that you do the right thing in your installation. First, delete these folders (and all contents, YOURNAME is the name of your account): "C:\ProgramData\Embarcadero" "C:\Program FIles (x86)\Embarcadero" "C:\Users\YOURNAME\AppData\Roaming\Embarcadero" "C:\Users\YOURNAME\AppData\Local\Embarcadero" Then with Regedit utility delete these keys (and all sub): HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Embarcadero HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Embarcadero That's should be enough. Bye

Virus Total "simply" report what append to all environment when the software run. What the SO does is not under control or analyzed from VT. I think the you can send how many applications you want to Virus Total and all of them will be signaled for those "issue". All the IP calls don't come from the software but from the common environment loaded, one hundred DLLs or more? Windows makes many IP calls for a multitude of needs, so this should not be a "meter" to measures an issue.

Virus Total use virtual environment to test the application, so is possible (may be sure) that some DLL of Windows environment call Internet location to do something (think about SmartScreen that search for information about executable). So, that is not a Issue (and Virus Total list only one of many antivirus engine to exploit that). Bye

Rad Studio 12. Windows 11 23H2 Parnassus Debugger and Core are installed from GetIt (date 13 November 2023). I have issues with Parnassus debugger like in the past. Create a blank project and start it with debugger. Close the executable and then close the IDE ... an AV is raise multiple times until you end that with task manager. But ... If you close the project (close all) from IDE and then close the IDE then no AV is raised. If none has suggestions i will signal that to QP.

There is already an internal report for this Issue.

I don't think there is a good solution (some hacks surely). But I think the choose of Microsoft is a good solution. If are writing something in your TextWriter I don't think you liked that another application start in foreground (and maybe you write on it causing disaster). When I use an application I really don't desire that another application popup in front ....

For me is offline now, but @Dave Nottage said that there are 48 hours of "down" ... so may be tomorrow it will alive again.

That are the documentation for the SetForegroundWindow ... https://learn.microsoft.com/it-it/windows/win32/api/winuser/nf-winuser-setforegroundwindow I think the the link view it in Italian (my language) ... but you can easy make a search in your language. Of course this is for an application, but the IDE is an application so the rules are those. Bye

The dir command redirect on file (not on screen) stay near 2 seconds to list 141792 files in 14500 directories, the Delphi code stay 339 millisec. ... with Delphi 12 ... Over that was for the cache operations.... without cache the Delphi code and dir command (on file) are exactly the same (1,9 sec.) On Windows directory the code (and dir at the same time) the time was 6.8 sec for 170500 files and 85000 directories.

I have never used their hardware directly, but I have worked on several systems where these were used (they used canbus motors to move the cameras) and I know that the basic APIs were used. The systems have always worked without any problems (I have made about a hundred).

You can start from here, they should have something for canbus (their hardware, PEAK CANBUS): https://www.peak-system.com/PCAN-Basic.239.0.html?&L=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIhOuR_8C6ggMVvJKDBx08TgQbEAAYASABEgLiAvD_BwE

64 bit app can run only 64 bit dll, and 32 bit app can run only 32 bit dll. But you can "connect" to 32 or 64 bit Com Object if it is out-of-process, from any process (both 32 and 64 bit).

For me too Parnassus add-on produce runtime error inside IDE. One of the DLL of Parnassus is naming YUKON (name code of beta RAD) .... maybe something should be changed ...

I think you cannot debug Delphi and C++ at the same time .... may be is related: https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-30893?filter=-2

I'm not expert on that, but from what I have seen of development "out there" I don't think there is this great need. But perhaps for certain specific purposes or for some algorithms this may be necessary. The development, even if it is a niche, is still going well. What I was focusing on is that it is useless to provide only partial "optimization" parts, because they are too dependent on the hardware ... unless such optimizations are to be used only and exclusively on specific hardware (if I have to mainly use Intel's I certainly wouldn't use the AVX512, but if I only use AMD maybe yes).

Quite interesting, but I think it's not complete. Support to AVX2 should be full available. Intel new processors (12th, 13th and 14th gen.) don't support AVX512 (not even in the future, it seems). In the professional line of Intel (like some Xeon family) only a subset of AVX512 instructions are supported. The AVX2 instructions are more widely supported. Bye

Sorry, I don't understand ... for me that license means that you cannot use the software without releasing the source (and also the source of the derived product), this is not correlated to Web / Cloud or others .... I'm missing something and I'm wrong ?