Jump to content

oliwe

Members
  • Content Count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by oliwe


  1. I wouldn't have written it much differently - thank you for the entry. I'm more than disappointed... 12.0 is completely useless (for me).
    I see it as an interim step and hope for 12.1 or 12.2. If 12.1 or 12.2 doesn't deliver, C++Builder is dead.

     

    CMake can not be used to compile VTK, OpenCV, ITK, and so on ... since ages. TwineCompile is a ray of hope - without the TC I would already be lost.

     

    The thing is, I definitely believe that they (Embacadero) are trying to advance C++Builder.
    I keep my fingers crossed.


  2. The problem was - as one might suspect - a path problem. Going to "Tools->Options->Language->C++->Paths and Definitions". Then Platfrom Win64, and then under Library path all paths were created multiple times - not just the JEDI paths, so e.g. "$(BDSLIB)\win64\release" was several times in the list. This probably resulted in a string that was too long and caused the link command to fail. Sorry - I have nothing good to say about 12.0 - it's just a mess. And I am a patient person. The last few weeks have been scary. But hopefully it continues, hope dies last.


  3. I fully agree with that.
    The fact that open source libraries are not easy to use with RAD Studio or C++Builder is one of the biggest limitations. Installing via GetIt is nice, but much more important from my point of view is a reasonable support of CMake.

    I think you get young programmers at school and in the universities - there you set yourself on a "favorite IDE". Without the ability to compile open source libraries, Embarcadero is out of the race when it comes to generating young talents who use RAD Studio. What a pity!

    I am using VTK with RAD Studio - the only reason for that is because I am bound to the IDE with old projects. It would be cool if we put together in this thread or wherever C++ libraries that can be "somehow" compiled with RAD Studio. In cooperation with Embarcadero we should bring the open source capability forward piece by piece.

     

    PS
    Okay, I'm dreaming 😉

    • Like 1

  4. I can support David's statement.
    Code Completion works much better now in 10.4.2, not perfect but it is definitely usable.

    I had similar problems in my larger projects like you, Totte, for years.
    Would be very interesting to find out why it still doesn't work for you.

    I use bcc64 - can this make a difference?

     

    PS
    After the last sentence I set "Target Platforms" to Win 32-bit (bcc32c) in my open project.

    (I never compile for 32bit usually)
    Then I tested Code Completion - nothing, no result after 1 or 2 minutes.
    Also, changing the options did not change anything. Zero respond.

    Then I switched back to 64-bit - Code Completion was broken there also.
    Zero respond.

    I tried everything to make it work again - nothing helped.
    Panic. After a reboot and "I don't know what", Code Completion works under 64bit again - I won't try 32bit again.

    Is this perhaps a problem with the chosen target platform after all?


  5. I use TwineCompile since a while and I am really happy with it.
    Most of the time it works quite well ... sometimes it freezes my IDE.
    But this is another topic ...

    My question here is:
    I am on RAD Studio 10.4.2, developing C++ projects.
    When I change the Build Configuration of a project e.g. from Debug to Release via the Projects Window then TwineCompile starts to compile the whole project immediately.
    I do not like this.
    I am not sure, but I think the behavior was different in 10.4.1?
    Can the direct compilation be disabled?

    I want to determine when to compile 🙂


  6. As with 10.4.0 and 10.4.1, there may be various problems installing 10.4.2. In the old forum, which is now unfortunately offline, there was a thread in this regard.

    That's why I'm taking up this topic again - in order to gather proposals for solutions.

    There is also a bug report RSP-29385, https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-29385 regarding these problems.

     

    Yesterday I installed 10.4.2 on two computers. On the workstation, the installation went smoothly. On my notebook (dual GPU system, 10.3.3 is there also installed) the installation failed.

    Reason: Missing bds.exe .

    Both are on the latest Windows 10 version. However by copying the bds.exe from the workstation installation to the directory \21.0\bin on the notebook I could also successfully complete the installation on the notebook.

    • Sad 1
×