Sonjli

I don't know if this is the right place. Sorry in advance if I did a mistake. - Delphi 10.4.1 - GExperts 1.3.18 - Always when close appear an error similar "Error in expert 18". It is favorites file - After this error, Delphi never closes and a lot of AV comes from hell 🙂 - Tried to disable the expert with no success - I have never used this expert - I removed from DPR of the last SVN commit all the uses about favorites and recompile - No more errors

Hello, I don't know how I can pass an anonymous function inside a omniTask. Example: type TMyObject = class [...] end; TMyFunction = reference to function(const Arg1: string): TMyObject; var lFunc: TMyFunction; procedure Something; begin lFunc := function(const Arg1: string): TMyObject begin result := TMyObject.Create(Arg1); end; CreateTask( procedure(Task: IOmniTask) var lthdFunc: TMyFunction; lResult: TMyObject; begin lthdFunc := Task.Params['MyRefFunction'].As???; // <-- What here? lResult := lthdFunc('dummy'); [...] end ) .SetParameter('MyRefFunction', lFunc) .Run; end; Thanks in advance, Eddy.

The marvel: if ThereIsAnError then begin ShowMessage('This is the error'); Abort; end; All exceptions in a big project with this simple, magic trick... I had to work 2 weeks to change all the exception handling system.

Thank you for Superset, it looks amazing!

Hello, I hope this is the right topic. I am looking for a tool for creating web dashboards starting from Firebird databases. I used some time ago Grafana (https://grafana.com/) but it has not driver for Firebird\Interbase and similar. Do you know any tool that permits the user creation of a query and customization of result data? I don't need a compelete BI, just a web tool to custom-create data analytics (pies, linears, etc) with Firebird. Thanks. Eddy

I try to better explain my problem. I understand the last question was a bit (lot...) stupid 😉 I need to know if the receiver task is alive. In some cases the receiver task has gone so I continue to send messages to it and I receive this error: "TOmniCommunicationEndpoint.Send: Queue is full" How can I avoid this problem? I would like to do something like this: if not MyTask.IsDead then MyTask.Comm.Send(...) // or if WatchDog(MyTask) <> Dead then MyTask.Comm.Send(...) // where WatchDog can check the healty of the Task and the MyTask.Comm.Writer.IsFull Thanks in advance, Eddy

Hi, I hardly use tasks comm. A very simple question: is this code right? if lTask.Comm.Writer.IsFull then begin lLocalLogger.Debug(Format('Task Queue is FULL %s...', [lTask.Name]), lSenderLogTagMain); Sleep(1000); ... end else lTask.Comm.Send(WM_RECEIVE_DO, TOmniValue.CastFrom < IBroadcastMessage < TDataPacketBody >>(ABroadcastMessage)); ...

Hi, yes I'd prefer this. How do you do this? GExperts does this before compiling or building.

Hi, ok, I set my mind in ease...

Hello, I have an automation system to deploy a big application. In this automation system I build some projects in Delphi. I use the "Set Component Properties" of GExperts to update some properties before the build process. I do this "by hand" setting this: Is it possible to use a command line for any tool of GExperts? Or an sdk to implements this? Thanks, Eddy

I need strongest drugs... but also for me a coffee is enough for now 😅

I need to read the XML quickly. But the server administrator warn me often about high cpu. I understand your axiom. I use Neslib.Xml and it seems well done both in performance and resource utilization. So you recommend me to say to sa to "put his heart in peace"... I can publish the problematic loops but, as you write, the "problem" is implicitly the XML library. Thanks guys.

Hello, I have a task with three nested loops using an XML library to read some parts of a big XML. This loop is too tight and processor works between 20% and 30% only for this process. The "sleep" is not a solution because the XML must be read very quickly. Is there any other solution to avoid the use of so much processor? Thanks, Eddy

What kind of infos do you need to reproduce?

Hi, I hope this is not duplicate... but I can't find anyone with this behaviour. I don't know how to describe this, a glitch? Sorry, look at the attachment. Thanks Eddy