mvanrijnen

quick question, does it support (now or in the near feature 😉 ), an include system, like in Home Assistant ? This can be very handy to splitup config files, for example sepeare the database configs in a single database.yaml file for multiple services example: network: listenip: 127.0.0.1 port: 8081 proxy: host: myproxyhost.mydomain.tld port: 9090 databases: !include ..\GeneralConfig\databases.yaml

typical forum answer ..................................... Define, Define ? something more then, Hello World 3 million lines, 10thousand files? let me rephrase .... Has someone experienced progress with the code completion, lsp, codeinsight from D12.x to D13.x ?

People tried the codecompletion. error insight etc, with a big project?

mostly good old init style like files, one service an xml as config file, but most ini style like. we got our own config readers for this wich works with attribute decorating, busy with some new things, gonna pick this up with yaml. It's always a bit of puzzle with "nesting" with the ini style like configs.

Nice work, maybe a good base for upgrading our config files to YAML,

yes, it's not really a fix, but i (we) removed RAD server from the equation. (moved from RAD server to MARS Rest library from @Andrea Magni, works amazingly well) @Marco Cantu @Ian Barker I really can not get my head around the fact that EMB does not fix this, it renders the IDE almost useless if your using bpls in your application/solution

Aha, i tried the JSONName before, did not work, but now i found out why, it's in the MARS.Core.JSON.pas, not in the MARS.Core.Attributes.pas The function ToJSONFilter(const AMember: TRttiMember; const AObj: TJSONObject): Boolean; works also, thanks!

there's also the old: IndexText or IndexStr method System.StrUtils.IndexText - RAD Studio API Documentation

Anoyone an idea how to get this done? If i have a record/class as a return type for q request, i sometimes want to hide certain properties for the (de)serialization process. can not find what to use with the MARS framework for this?

hm, does the ramdisk makes much difference with building?

@Marco Cantu I'm glad to say that we did fix the problem ...

If you create the datamodule per request, why not set the connection in the datamodule as a property (set it from within the request). I do that in some projects. (needs some work maybe on the setter of connection property in the datamodule) So you would get something like: function TMyResource.GetInfo(const APar1: string; const APar2: integer): TMyInfo; var ldm : TMyDataModule; begin ldm := TMyDataModule.Create(); try ldm.MyConnection := FD.Connection; ldm.DoMyMethod(APar1, APar2); finally ldm.Free; end; end; Maybe you have a (simple) example of your code?

??? The summit is held in Purmerend (a place near Amsterdam), but it's called Delphi Summit Amsterdam, don't know where you were thinking of, but if it was ment as a joke, it's not a funny joke?

Most funny thing is that nobody can confirm this is fixed. Kind of confirmation of what a laugh the Delphi IDE is become .......................... Time to make a list of critical question for the next Summit in Purmerend (Amsterdam for the commercial guys&girls).

Does someone ( @Marco Cantu) knows if this is solved in 12.3.x? We are sure gonna leave the whole RadServer concept because of the lack of support/maintenance. (probably going the MARS way) Who releases a software development product which can debug? (curious the way this went to production/release, Boss! We can not debug the radserver modules, oh, "nobody cares, just ship it,")