mvanrijnen

maybe an EOL too many/too short ? (at the end of the file)

-nevermind, reado ver the base64 thing-

Don't know your "memcache" class, but why not use a simple dictionairy ?

When i logon from a second instance of a client, on the radserver the previous session of that user becomes invalid. We do the logon with a username/password, and then use the token (session authorization). Somebody, who als ran into this problem ? Also posted here, but slow reactions from EMB: https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-34146?

Okay, we have two enterprise subscription, that would be good for 6 issues then?

Yes, i think it's the combination of code for the "SingleInstanceApp" and the code we use for the selfupdating capability of that application, that includes a createprocess after updating the executable. This also explains why a test application with only the SingleInstanceApp keeps working and is ok for the AV. gonna creeate a testapp with both the SingeInstanceApp and the selfupdating code. (it;s just 2 units with a few calls to them). thnx for the info on the codesigning thing

It's really weird. The stripped down example file, which only contains the SingeInstanceUnit, a form with a memo, is not pointed out as malicious. The original program, is not withouth the SingleInstanceUnitCode, but is with, but only after a specific use. (for so as as i can see now). I can start the program and use it, when the SingInstance behaviour is executed a few times, then after a certain amount of time, is is pointed as malicious, the process is killed and the .exe is removed. (it's Bitdefender advanced thread control). already uploaded samples to them, waiting for the response. Then code signing we will do, gonna propose it to the boss. it's not expensive so thats no problem.

yes, i'll change that 🙂 So you suggest, to make a small exe with only this code, and send it to them? Submitted example to: https://www.bitdefender.com/submit

Yes its for applicaton we use internally only. On filescan there all undetected (virustotal), so it seems the behaviour is the cause. (we have bitdefender endpoint security tools since a few weeks now)

Yes but because it's for our own internal software, which is copied to the clients from an "applauncher" with versiion control etc, it does not add that much for us if it does nothing with the malware/virusscan software.

A small bump and topic hack. Will code signing also prevent from virusscanners see an executable as malicious ? We do have that with some applications here sometimes. (we only write software for use within our own company)

some questions are a bit personal

At the moment here it's like the LSP/Codecompletion etc, is dependant on the weather or something, can not get my finger at it, when it stops. sometimes it works all day, today, it stops every 5 minutes working. (especially, codecompletion and jump to things in other units)

Here is the LSP working for most of the time. so still some issues with newly added files now en then (especcialy when you drag/drop an existing source file to a project).

Yes, don't think those two are compatible, (2010), 2013,2016,2019 should work for the most common things, besides i think it's a hazard to still run OL2003 (so is 2010 (&2013?) no more security fixes)

same here, i assume the install is ok, otherwise an error would be shown after installation? maybe @Marco Cantu can say something about this? after all EMB points to this forum itself, so maybe they want to be a little bit involved in the community ?

Would like to join the Beta, but can find not one usable link, searched for 15minutes. Website is one big commercial shit. We are on subscription license. One would think that something like this is available from "The New Customer Portal".

its not clear for EMB workers also, look at the reaction from EMB: [RSP-33759] compiler failures - Embarcadero Technologies "Yevhen Buhai requested more info in order to validate the issue and commented: Hello, can you attach please the test project where it happened?" Instead of, "Yes we are aware of this problem, and are fixing it really soon ..."

I have no speakers at my desktop at work, very difficult to listen to a webinar, it should not be that difficult, to communicate this kind of things in a way that's obvious for everyone, (email ???), some subforum at this website ? Maybe, maybe if they think of it, on their own website, or maybe from within the IDE.

Yes, ok. was just a little joke. nofi But i' m really curious where the different behaviour comes from, some people have never problems, and other again and again. Maybe EMB should do a kind of investigation on the machines/projects what causes the problems at some people,

So, what would be the difference between people with and people without the problems? * Installed packages ? * Windows environment, version, updates ? * Multiple Delphi IDE's open at one time ? (i've sometimes 3-5 open delphi ide's). * FMX, VCL development ? Looks sometimes a little bit like the dutch government nowdays, EMB and the MVP's denying the problems, and we the "people" (eg normal users/customers) are stuck with the ..... 🙂 Still wondering why no communication from EMB at all, they are on this Forum, better they refer to this forum, would be nice if the where some bit more active and/or responsive.

I think he points to the DosCommand, which can be installed with GetIt itself, do this before u compile autogetit. (so start Delphi, go to GetIt, install DosCommand from there), continue compiling autogetit after that.

We check the email address just with delphi code, implemented the rules needed. Also check the TLD against a TLD table, and we check if the email address is really accepted. (lookup mx, and simulate sending a mail, with most servers you can check if the email address is known to the server. (catch all addressess are always ok, thats a thing),. With this method we known which customers we need to contact to get a new valid email address. (our company does not have a customer portal, so we need to check everything ourselves)

start here 🙂 : REST.Client.TRESTClient - RAD Studio API Documentation (embarcadero.com)