Jump to content

Roger Cigol

Members
  • Content Count

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Roger Cigol

  1. You can't use googletest with the classic compiler. GoogleTest requires at least C++11 support (I think). It definitely will not compile with the classic compiler. For classic compiler you need to use the DUnit test framework. This is a little limited but it works very well and reliably.
  2. I don't know R at all. But looking at your code it's all fairly clear what's going on (<- is the same as delphi := [took me 30s to work this out]). Your key challenge is to make sure you select the correct types for the variables used. I am a strong advocate of writing readable (and hence supportable) code. I would respectfully suggest that you use longer, more meaningful names for the function and for the variables it uses. This would make it much much easier to see what the function does and how it does it.
  3. There were some reported issues with the web install process. Repeat of installation does sometimes solve it. Installing from the iso avoids this problem - download the iso - extract and install. But there is a possible danger: Embarcadero recommend installing 11.1 using the same method as 11.0 (I believe) so if you used the Web Install for 11.0 it may be wise to use web install for 11.1. I own up to using the iso as my preferred install method - you can download the iso whilst doing something useful elsewhere and then once you start the install you know you are free of any internet connection issues causing a problem.
  4. I have now added my further blog that explains how I am actually using googleTests on a working (or at least on going development) clang 64 VCL C++ Builder project (using RAD Studio 11.1) https://cigolblog.wordpress.com/2022/03/25/tips-for-using-googletests-with-embarcadero-clang64-for-windows-vcl-projects-2/
  5. Roger Cigol

    Trial RAD 11 expired Delphi CE is 10.x

    ...and the version of CE does tend to lag behind the latest release, too
  6. Roger Cigol

    code completion?

    In 11.1 a new VCL project defaults to clang32 (not classic). and I, for one, am an enthusiastic professional C++ programmer who uses Embarcadero RAD Studio 11.1. It is true there is a "balance" between the classic compiler and clang compiler for Win32 VCL applications. Once you have used C++ 17 it is very painful to go back to the restrictions of the classic compiler though.....
  7. Roger Cigol

    Delphi 11.1 is available

    I downloaded the ISO and successfully ran a problem free install of RAD Studio 11.1 from the iso.
  8. Roger Cigol

    Delphi 11.1 is available

    I enjoy being an MVP and benefit greatly from conversing with esteemed colleagues, many of whom are much more experienced and widely knowledgeable than me. I keep a track of all the time I spend on MVP related tasks. At my standard programming hourly rate I spend significantly more time on MVP work than the cost of the annual subscription for "RAD Studio Enterprise". So yes, @Uwe Raabeis correct it does come with "some obligations".
  9. Roger Cigol

    Delphi 11.1 Crash on Search Menu Access

    This works fine (both Find... and Find in files...) using highlighted text for C++ files running 11.1 under windows 10. Difficult to imagine why it should be different on Windows 11, so lets see if anyone else has the same issue....
  10. Great news : Google Tests all looks good for 11.1. I've blogged about how to get it up and running... https://cigolblog.wordpress.com/2022/03/17/using-googletests-with-embarcadero-clang64-for-windows-vcl-projects-c-builder-11-1/ I will add a further blog in the next few days about how I like to use it for testing my Clang64bit projects.
  11. Roger Cigol

    Migration Tool (11 --> 11.1)

    I too selected "option 2" and all the registry entries seem to have persisted. My (limited) use of 11.1 makes me feel it is a great improvement over 11.0
  12. I have several tables that I want to completely empty. My plan was to use a single TFDQuery and to set (at design time) the SQL to DELETE FROM :tablename and then to set the :tablename parameter to type ptInput and datatype to ftString. Then I planned to call this query for each table, having set the parameter to the table name. But it doesn't work, each call to Execute() (following the setting of the parameter to the required table name) gives an exception. I am using a 64bit PostgreSQL database so I can't test the parameter query at design time (can't connect from a 32 bit app). If I query my database directly using a query tool I can enter DELETE FROM MyTable and all the contents of MyTable disappear as required. I also find that the following code works (I am using C++ clang 64 in Alexandria 11.0): auto SQL(std::make_unique<TStringList>()); SQL->Clear(); SQL->Add(String("DELETE FROM ") + DestinationTableName); DestinationDeleteAllFDQuery->Close(); DestinationDeleteAllFDQuery->SQL->Text = SQL->Text; DestinationDeleteAllFDQuery->OpenOrExecute(); My question is : Is this expected behaviour? ie Is it known that parameters in FireDAC queries can not used to pass table names ?
  13. Roger Cigol

    FireDAC TFDQuery - table names as parameters

    This "generalisation" of FireDAC to suit the very many supported databases is one of it's great features. It is worth using approaches that continue/extend this generalisation primarily because it allows re-use of your code in other applications (that could be using different databases). As it happens the job that led to my question is actually migrating a working-well-for-many-years system that uses MS Access to a 64 bit application using PostgreSQL. The fact that the MS Access system uses FireDAC makes this task so much more straightforward.
  14. Roger Cigol

    Comport Serial Port help

    What you are really asking is "how to convert data in a string of a particular format" into a binary integer. But you are asking this question without giving us the actual string. So with the code where you "get the correct string" - what string do you get? maybe offer a few examples with different inputs on the ADC.
  15. Hi @David Heffernan, My pondering continued (and continues). Can you confirm that I am correct in concluding that it is the application (ie task) responsibility to maintain the correct FPU exception settings amongst threads it uses but it is the operating system's responsibility to maintain the FPU settings when process time is switched from one task to another. If this is the case then this makes sense to me and explains why applying the fixes so well outlined in your pdf would make a lot of sense.
  16. [pdf] That's a very interesting read, thank you I think your statement about what you do to the floating point control state is what I am trying to achieve with my use of the two SetExceptions() calls.
  17. I am very worried by David H's posting here. But also this could explain an issue I've had on a system for a long time that calls a 3rd party dll that I suspect creates it's own threads. This seems to at random times generate unexpected windows "exception" messages. The documentation at https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/Alexandria/en/About_Floating-Point_Arithmetic is pretty good at telling you HOW to change floating point exceptions but not at all clear at what to set them to! Do you recommend when calling external 3rd party dlls that you make a call to SetExceptions() with a value of zero, storing the result (the current settings) into some local variable) before calling the 3rd party dll and then a call to SetExceptions passing the value saved in the local value as soon as the dll completes ? You may well choose to answer as an experienced Delphi programmer - any advice for me writting in C++ (using classic,, clang32 and clang64 compilers for different apps) would be welcome too. Thinking about the mulit-threading floating point interaction, surely the only way to achieve this would be to make sure the floating point unit is correctly configured before every floating point operation - a major overhead. I am still pondering this....
  18. For me properties are beautiful - they make clear and explicit how items of an interface can be used and, as Anders Melanders states, they hide the internals. And the way the VCL or FMX design time component system works (which relies on properties) is beautiful too.
  19. I use datamodules alot - I remove them from the autocreate list and then manually create and delete them in code (initialising with a nullptr for the owner (I'm a C++ gent)). I find this very convenient. Using pooled connections I find this works well.
  20. Roger Cigol

    XMLMapper crashes out on recursive XML Schema

    Lars, out of interest, where did you get the *.xsd schema that you posted on the RSP-36887? is it a public file or is it subject to confidentiallity and/or copyright issues ?
  21. Roger Cigol

    ISO8901: Week numbers and year

    I can't help here. But I can offer a warning to inexperienced "week number" users (which you may NOT be, I realise) and that is to beware of the week number 53 that does occur from time to time. I spent a long time debugging someone elses code once that stored week data in an array size [52] and overflowed causing corruption when week 53 came along.
  22. Roger Cigol

    XMLMapper crashes out on recursive XML Schema

    I notice a reply from David Millington on RSP-36887
  23. Roger Cigol

    Frequent and/or annoying typos you make while coding

    I find this all reassuring - all it really means is that we are all human. Which reminds me, I need to stop and go and cook the evening meal.....
  24. When I open any particular forum item it always opens on the first page. I guess this is a good idea if it's the first time one is reading that set of postings. But surely it is more common that you are going back to see recent additions to and ongoing discussion ( I do this regularly ). It would be much more convenient if, when opening and individual forum item, it opened on the last page (and perhaps even showing the most recent (ie the last) entry ?)....
  25. Roger Cigol

    Got to last page of forum item ?

    To much to do and so little time..... Didn't spot that link - many thanks : I can see myself using this frequently (therefore saving just a little time and therefore getting just a little more done....)
×