Attila Kovacs

@Kryvich I'm not sure, you were navigating through prev/next difference. I'm looking for the exact actions I've mentioned.

Phew, I was trying what you wrote. In the first place, I got a list index out of bounds (xx) in the "Differences view" :D, then "show in difference viewer" does nothing, the form flashes in then disappears and nothing changes. And when I go back to the normal "code" view, I can't save the unit anymore. Unable to rename bla.pas to bla.pas~1~ :DDDD It's just ridiculous.

I'll wait, I'm on Berlin. Take your time, no rush.

I could not find any of the words "modified", "disappear", "icons" in this context on this page, but there is a setting in the options to show or hide those icons. At least in older IDEs. I also have those icons off because it takes too much place, so I prefer your solution. Do you offer it for older IDE versions too? Maybe with configurable colors? Publishing the source code?

It is. Now. But it has no https, and not much traffic yet.

And here https://plus.google.com/111330494852358926278/posts/f3GnDud9gbC And here https://en.delphipraxis.net/topic/237-new-in-103-improvements-to-the-options-dialogs/?tab=comments#comment-1861 And nobody complained for criss-cross posting yet 😛

Wow. Does this search box integrated into the NC area (*sigh*) work without the moderntheme or what .bpl?

A bit better quality for the small ones. DP.ico

I've got a message 'your previous input was restored blabla', then I pressed clear the editor, and it's gone forever(?).

Well, I did not found the cause yet, but I found that if you do a right-click on the editor then the keyboard-shortcut works again. Would be cool to catch the case which disables or removes this menu and report it.

refresh Primoz' answer and see the last line in his code

CreateProcess / WaitForSingleObject Ahm, crossplatform! In this case, not! 😉 Btw, what is the cross-platform OpenSCAD calling convention? Is there any? ifdef? Maybe you could place the wait code for the process into those sections?

@Kryvich Interesting, I'll check. Thank you!

@Johan Bontes if x() is just an example and not part of the problem. It could be xres := x(s,s). And in your y() example I can't see any danger. Result is a separate string which will be copied /(or assigned its pointer?) to S at the end. Which means, the same performance or worse as omitting 'const' in my original post.

@Kryvich It would be the same if I omit const for input, am I right?

The problem in this case is, that the output string can be the same string as the input is "if x(s, s)", and depending on what x does, it can lead to unpredictable errors. The question is rather how people are dealing with such functions, avoid this pattern totally, doesn't care, changing result with a parameter (which leads to another memory allocation), testing if input is the same as output on the beginning, etc...

@Markus Kinzler Examples are welcome. I'm open to learn.

@Markus Kinzler @Primož Gabrijelčič if x(s, s) .... and manipulating result on char basis for example

@Michael Puff Is there any Title writing training for dummies? I'm coming from g+, there was no title as you know...

@David Millington Nice, is it your work? Btw. a customizable property sub-tab would be nice, with favorite props. And the "Quick copy name" link always on the first place. Now it's just a Not-So-Quick-Copy-Name-Because-We-Have-To-Look-After-It. 😉

@Stefan Glienke Even if it breaks your Uses Helper for long time? 😉 (hidden hint :P)

{$ENDIF Something}? Rather: procedure DoesSomething; var var1: Integer; {$IFDEF Something} {$IFNDEF DXE103UP} var2: Integer; {$ENDIF} {$ENDIF} begin // use var1 {$IFDEF Something} {$IFDEF DXE103UP} var var2: Integer; {$ENDIF} // use var1 and var2 {$ENDIF} end; How many of you can start using the new syntax without paying attention?

@Vincent Parrett For me everything is cached, I've 19.2KB traffic on refreshing the page.

Loading the same page without logged in, TTFB 40ms. Over a hetzner ssh-tunel it drops to 250ms when logged in. Non-logged in connection almost the same, ~40ms.

@Markus Kinzler Yes, 1+1=2 + <Nickles superlative>.