Darian Miller

I was playing with a little threading project tonight and I did a quick update on this unit to add a delay similar to what you suggested. (Now also call Get/SetThreadDescription if available) https://github.com/ideasawakened/iaLib/blob/master/Source/iaRTL.NameDelphiThreads.Windows.pas

See some notes here for issues with 12.2: https://github.com/ideasawakened/DelphiKB/wiki/D29.ATHENS.12.2.0.0 I haven't updated the wiki yet for the 2 patches for 12.2 One reason to upgrade is Smart Codeinsight

This is probably the better choice: https://www.delphitools.info/dwscript/

This one has a long history: https://github.com/remobjects/pascalscript

In a codegen project I am working on, I am importing an API and creating the Delphi code to utilize it. I prefer working with records so most of the codegen is creating record types for the request/response objects exposed by the API. However, about 5% or less of this large API types involve circular references between types. I tried a few different approaches and couldn't come up with a decent solution with records so I starting to use forward declaration with classes, at least for this 5%. That seems to work, but now I think I need to make all the types classes instead of having a mixture. I ventured into Variants and even implemented my own custom type via TInvokeableVariantType to get some properties defined but generic variant custom record types don't work. It was a cool side trek but didn't solve this problem. After stewing on this for a while, I thought I'd ask for any feedback. Would you prefer a large API with 95% simple records and some occasional class-based request/responses due to a funky API design, or would you want to see it consistent throughout and only use classes? Or would you implement an alternative approach? TRecordA = record Field1:Integer; Field2:TRecordB; Field3:string; TopX:TRecordC; end; TRecordB = record Field4:Integer; Field5:TRecordA; end; TRecordC = record Items:TArray<TRecordA>; end;

See: https://www.embarcadero.com/support Premium Update Subscription support includes "Regular online meetings with the product team and individual company roadmap sessions" I am curious if anyone has purchased Premium Update Subscription and has received roadmap sessions... They have said in the past that if you are an active subscriber that you can privately ask about roadmap issues (nad not necessarily requiring Premium support.)

If you purchased 11 but your subscription ran out after 11.1 was released but before 11.2 was released, you could only use 11.1 even though 11.2 is another update to 11. I assume you should be able to download 11.1 in that scenario but accessing installers after your subscription runs out is a murky area to me. I believe they allow you to access the download portal only if you have an active subscription - so it's up to you to ensure that you download the installers you need and keep local copies before your subscription runs out. (Since you aren't paying them anything for ongoing support, you would be expecting lifetime free access to that large database of installers that they maintain - which seems like a valid argument from their side. On the flip side, bandwidth is pretty cheap these days and they are already hosting it for paying customers...) Alternatively, while you have an active subscription, you should at least keep a copy of their public download links so you can download them later as needed (for example, keep this link for the 10.4 ISO image: https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/10.4/RADStudio-1042-4203.iso) Of course, they could change those download links in the future so it's best to keep local copies if you are not maintaining an active subscription. The best solution is to always keep your subscription active and up to date. It benefits the entire community by keeping your subscription current.

New blog post from Embarcadero on 64-bit LSP https://blogs.embarcadero.com/delphi-lsp-64-bit-power-for-large-projects-and-improved-codeinsight/

d102 is for RAD Studio 10.2 Tokyo. d103 is 10.3 Rio. d104 is for 10.4 Sydney. d110 is for 11 Alexandria And d101 is for 10.1 Berlin. So you want to open the group project file in 10.1: packages/d101/dmvcframework_group.groupproj and Build All and then right click the design time package and hit Install. (And follow instructions to edit library paths) For Delphi 11, open packages/d110/dmvcframework_group.groupproj and repeat.

JIRA Service Desk is an abomination... but so many companies are tied into the JIRA/Confluence infrastructure that they can get away with it being so terrible. That reality sucks. I recommended they go with something else, or write their own. A simple service desk system written in TMS WebCore or Quartex Pascal would be a nice solution using a RAD Server middle tier with Interbase backend. But it's too big of a project to add to their overly full plate.

27398 attached 27398_unicode_statistics_tool.ZIP

My guess is that Aliasing would bring in a new set of problems but if it's just a preprocessor type replacement, it might be OK. But look at your example code - what is the scope of "NewQty"? Does it belong to A, to B, or to the Form, or to a variable or method somewhere? If it doesn't belong to A or B, what if "NewQty" is added to A or B as a property or method later? Boom, your with-bomb will explode into a nice bug.

I quoted your blog article in mine. Thanks for the +1.

New blog post on WITH statements. The topic was recently discussed once again in the Delphi Developers Telegram group which triggered a blog post: https://ideasawakened.com/post/why-you-should-not-use-WITH-in-your-Delphi-code

If you are running Delphi 11.3, then you shouldn't see (or attempt to use) the 11.1 Debugging Patch in GetIt. That fix is in 11.3 already. 11.3 has one patch available but also note that 11.3 was re-released as "11.3 Build 2024" https://github.com/ideasawakened/DelphiKB/wiki/D28.ALEXANDRIA.11.3.0.2