PeterPanettone

Thomas, I've built #2590. But I don't see where I can display and/or export a merged list of all used units in the whole project. The list created by "Export Used Units..." is the same as before. BTW, is there somewhere a possibility to see the current version/release number in the IDE, because both the old and the new show the same version number:

I have discovered this extremely useful feature: Find previous/next occurrence (Shift + Alt + Left): This jumps to the previous or next occurrence of the current identifier and then opens this popup window: So my question is: How can I DIRECTLY open this extremely useful popup window (using the current identifier) without having to previously do the Find previous/next occurrence (Shift + Alt + Left) command? I am aware that there is the Find Identifier command which displays this Search box: However, this Find Identifier search box has the inconvenience to not automatically insert the currently selected identifier or the identifier under the cursor into the search field. Or is it possible to configure this?

I have filed a new feature suggestion for MMX: The "Find Identifier" popup window should have an "implementation" marking: This would be very useful as it would allow seeing at a glance which identifiers are above or inside the implementation section!

I like this idea.

Good point. Yes, different text and/or background colors for interface and implementation would be nice. The aim is to somehow indicate the scope of each found identifier. But then it would be logical to differentiate also between other scopes? What do you think?

Writing "implementation section" in each and every found item is useless and takes too much space on the list. One single implementation marking like in my example is enough to clearly see which found items are above the implementation keyword and which ones are below the implementation keyword, as there is maximally only ONE implementation keyword in a unit.

The "implementation" marking is much better visible and therefore more INTUITIVE.

Having such a flexible option IMO would be useful in EVERY case.

I agree for very few cases. In most cases, the directly used units would be enough. Maybe an option (a checkbox) "Include indirectly used units" would be the optimal solution?

Sorry for making the impression of "ranting". It was REALLY meant as objective and constructive feedback. Discussions can have ramifications. Peace! "colors, images and image sizes" are not irrelevant. They are an (often overlooked) essential part of the user interface and thus of the program's functionality in the wider sense. Do you want me to file a feature request for this?

There is another one which seems to be the most obvious: When migrating a project (maybe a legacy project or a project received from another developer) it is important to have a complete overview of which units are used in the whole project.

YOU KNOW that the two toolbars each have a different functionality scope, but for the USER this is not visually evident. There should be a visual distinction between the two toolbars. BTW, the "Print" button could be easily overlooked as it has a grey color: , so it seems to be a disabled button. Enabled buttons should be colored to distinguish them from disabled buttons. Also, why using a "Printer" image for a REPORT functionality? This is clearly misleading. And why are the buttons so tiny? For example, these two buttons cannot be visually distinguished:

Is this logical? Because the Print dialog does not mention this. One would expect that the report outputs the same list as shown in the pane.

So the Print button in the Unit Dependency Analyzer will become my preferred workaround solution. I just need to write a small tool to format the list in the way I need it (as a uses clause list).

The Print feature seems to have a bug: With the only Show not found units filter switch activated, also the Show Found units items are output. Even with no filters activated, all items are output.

Here is the list: There is no way to copy or save the list.

The Unit Dependency Analyzer shows the used units per project unit. But not a merged list for the whole project.

The MMX Module Analyzer has the same problem: It lists BOTH explicit and implicit units.

I have this line in the map file: 0001:0033B2E8 000073E8 C=CODE S=.text G=(none) M=Vcl.Buttons ACBP=A9 But the unit Vcl.Buttons is not EXPLICITLY inside a uses clause inside my project. So I suppose the unit Vcl.Buttons is IMPLICITLY inside a used unit. How to differentiate between explicit and implicit units?

Thank you for your idea! The map file for my project is 93 MB. For what should I look?

That is useful only when using one of these options: Otherwise, attempting to load the associated form file can interfere with the current project! So, the MMX Indexer result-list should automatically load the result file in the IDE on mouse-click ONLY if the result-file is part of the current project (or if the result-file is already opened in the IDE). This would be much smarter! Additionally, when using the Root paths option or one of these options: ...then this option in most cases is useless: ...because the content of the Library path or the Browsing path does not change that often. In this case (if the Rebuild option is unchecked) it would be far more intelligent to not erase the index between IDE sessions or to rebuild the index only if a change has been detected in one of these paths! So a separate dockable context preview panel for the MMX Indexer IMO would be very useful.

That is also a great search tool with flexible options for the search locations: However, it lacks the invaluable CONTEXT PREVIEW of the GExperts Grep Search: ...which can be configured here: The MMX Indexer Search loads the result file in the IDE by just left-single-clicking the result line which for me is not good because it also attempts to load the associated form file (if it has one). It should definitely have a preview pane like Grep Search!

Jacek, thank you for pointing that out. I am using this feature all the time. It is INVALUABLE for checking whether there are other instances of the current identifier under the cursor nearby. On a wider scope, I use the GExperts Grep Search, as it can optionally even search an identifier in ALL FILES inside a project group!

Done. Thank you!

Yes, I mean without moving the cursor.