t2000 1 Posted May 6, 2020 Hello I have a command line program and a memory leak after closing But not always. Only 10-15% of starts are ending with the memory leak. Unexpected Memory Leak An unexpected memory leak has occurred. The unexpected small block leaks are: 41 - 56 bytes: TOmniCriticalSection x 1 137 - 152 bytes: TFixedCriticalSection x 1 This is the code of a unit that works like Application in VCL or FMX. The important positions are: constructor create : make Backgroundworker from outside comes a call to the procedure TServerApp.Call I put a record into the BlockingCollection and send a message the message comes to ProcessMessage and I call CreateWorkItem for the BackgroundWorker In my test, I start the program, I'm in the "Run" procedure, I send a call with WM_QUIT (from outside) and the program ends. Where and how can I try to find the problem? Has anybody an idea? Many thanks, Thomas unit sng.ServerApp; interface uses System.Classes, System.SysUtils, System.Generics.Collections, Winapi.Windows, Winapi.Messages, OtlCommon, OtlParallel, OtlCollections; type TWorkItemCallRec = record ProcToCall: TProc<TOmniValue>; Data: TOmniValue; end; TModules = TList<TComponent>; TServerApp = class( TComponent) private FRunning: Boolean; FTerminate: Boolean; FServerAppName : String; FServerModules : TModules; FMsgDataColl : TOmniBlockingCollection; FWorker : IOmniBackgroundWorker; function ProcessMessage(var Msg: TMsg): Boolean; procedure ProcessMessages; procedure CreateWorkItem; procedure ProcessWorkItem(const workItem: IOmniWorkItem); procedure HandleRequestDone(const Sender: IOmniBackgroundWorker; const workItem: IOmniWorkItem); public constructor Create(AOwner: TComponent); override; destructor Destroy; override; procedure Run; procedure Shutdown; procedure SendQuit; procedure Call( AMsgCode: Cardinal; AProcToCall: TProc<TOmniValue>; AData: TOmniValue); property ServerAppName: String read FServerAppName; property Terminated: Boolean read FTerminate; end; var ServerApp: TServerApp; implementation uses OtlTaskControl, OtlComm; { TServerApp } function TServerApp.ProcessMessage(var Msg: TMsg): Boolean; var Handled: Boolean; begin Result := False; if PeekMessage(Msg, NativeUInt(-1), 0, 0, PM_REMOVE) then begin Result := True; if Msg.Message <> WM_QUIT then begin Handled := False; if Msg.Message > sms_OFFSET then CreateWorkItem; if not Handled then begin TranslateMessage(Msg); DispatchMessage(Msg); end; end else begin FTerminate := True; end; end; end; procedure TServerApp.ProcessMessages; var Msg: TMsg; begin while ProcessMessage(Msg) do {loop}; end; procedure TServerApp.CreateWorkItem; var LWorkItem : IOmniWorkItem; LOmniValue : TOmniValue; begin if not FMsgDataColl.Take( LOmniValue) then raise Exception.Create('Internal Error. ServerApp FMsgDataColl.Take'); LWorkItem := FWorker.CreateWorkItem( LOmniValue); FWorker.Schedule( LWorkItem); end; procedure TServerApp.ProcessWorkItem(const workItem: IOmniWorkItem); var CallRec: TWorkItemCallRec; begin CallRec := workItem.Data.CastTo<TWorkItemCallRec>; CallRec.ProcToCall( CallRec.Data); workItem.Result := 0; end; procedure TServerApp.HandleRequestDone(const Sender: IOmniBackgroundWorker; const workItem: IOmniWorkItem); var eClass: string; exc : Exception; begin if workItem.IsExceptional then begin eClass := workItem.FatalException.ClassName; exc := workItem.DetachException; DoLog( loaError, 'Exception: WorkItem: '+workItem.UniqueID.ToString+': '+eClass+':'+exc.Message); FreeAndNil(exc); end else DoLog( 'HandleRequestDone: '+workItem.UniqueID.ToString+': '+workItem.Result.AsString); end; constructor TServerApp.Create(AOwner: TComponent); begin inherited; FServerModules := TModules.Create; FMsgDataColl := TOmniBlockingCollection.Create; FWorker := Parallel.BackgroundWorker .NumTasks( cServerAppBackgroundTasks) .OnRequestDone( HandleRequestDone) .TaskConfig( Parallel.TaskConfig.OnMessage( sms_Processing, procedure (const task: IOmniTaskControl; const msg: TOmniMessage) begin DoLog('OnMessage: '+msg.MsgData.AsString); end)) .Execute( ProcessWorkItem); end; destructor TServerApp.Destroy; var i: Integer; begin FMsgDataColl.Free; for i := FServerModules.Count-1 downto 0 do FServerModules[i].Free; FServerModules.Free; inherited; end; procedure TServerApp.Run; var Msg: TMsg; v: TProc; begin FRunning := True; try // evtl. Exitproc setzen repeat try if not ProcessMessage(Msg) then WaitMessage; except on e: Exception do writeln(e.Message); end; until Terminated; finally FRunning := False; end; end; procedure TServerApp.Shutdown; begin // Stoppen aller Dienste FWorker.CancelAll; end; procedure TServerApp.SendQuit; begin FWorker.CancelAll; PostThreadMessage( System.MainThreadID, WM_QUIT, 0, 0); end; procedure TServerApp.Call(AMsgCode: Cardinal; AProcToCall: TProc<TOmniValue>; AData: TOmniValue); var CallRec : TWorkItemCallRec; oValue : TOmniValue; begin CallRec.ProcToCall := AProcToCall; CallRec.Data := AData; oValue := TOmniValue.FromRecord(CallRec); FMsgDataColl.Add( oValue); PostThreadMessage( System.MainThreadID, AMsgCode, 0, 0); end; initialization ServerApp := TServerApp.Create(nil); finalization ServerApp.Free; end. Share this post Link to post
Primož Gabrijelčič 223 Posted May 6, 2020 Check the stack trace to see where this critical section is allocated from. If this is not possible with the FastMM that comes with Delphi (frankly, I don't use it and I have no idea), use FastMM from git and define FullDebugMode conditional. Share this post Link to post
Anders Melander 1814 Posted May 6, 2020 2 hours ago, t2000 said: if Msg.Message <> WM_QUIT then This is not related to your problem, but you should PostQuitMessage if you remove a WM_QUIT from the message queue. Share this post Link to post
Remy Lebeau 1421 Posted May 6, 2020 37 minutes ago, Primož Gabrijelčič said: If this is not possible with the FastMM that comes with Delphi It is not. 37 minutes ago, Primož Gabrijelčič said: use FastMM from git and define FullDebugMode conditional. That is what you will have to do. Share this post Link to post
Remy Lebeau 1421 Posted May 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, Anders Melander said: This is not related to your problem, but you should PostQuitMessage if you remove a WM_QUIT from the message queue. See Raymond Chen's blog for why: Modality, part 3: The WM_QUIT message and Why is there a special PostQuitMessage function? Share this post Link to post
t2000 1 Posted May 7, 2020 I have used FastMM4. Pretty hard, but now I know the most important things about FastMM4. I think, I have a side effect from my REST Server thread that works with TMS XData. I use a function with TJSONObject as parameter. (over REST). And there is a hidden Exception in a JSON converter. I haven't seen these exception before. If I change the (REST-) function result to an integer, I can't reproduce the memory leak. With the build in tools, I couldn't get a stack trace. Thanks for the first. I keep an eye on it. The WM_QUIT. Thanks for the note. But I don't have windows here. This is a command line application and later I build a service. The messaging system is only for my own. Perhaps, I can use a WM_USER message number for quit the program internally. Share this post Link to post
t2000 1 Posted May 7, 2020 My mistake. I have used a TJSONObject with another TJSONObject in it. In the create function I added the second TJSONObject instead of TJSONObject.Clone. The inner TJSONObject was releasd twice. And then, and then, and then ... I thinkt there were all side effects. Share this post Link to post