-
Content Count
3586 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
176
Everything posted by David Heffernan
-
Yeah, but performance isn't important for 98% of Delphi programmers. (am I doing this right?)
-
This makes absolutely no sense.
-
That's absolutely fair. But I was responding this this comment. If performance isn't important to you then you can just ignore such discussions. Just as I ignore discussions on things like database programming in Delphi, because I don't don't use Delphi for that.
-
My business is based around a computationally intensive numerical finite element code. The performance of the code emitted by the compiler is very important. Why do you think otherwise?
-
I'm happy for you that delphi is fast enough for you. It does produce slow code when compared to other mainstream modern compilers. C++ is a language with many compilers. Some compilers are faster than others. So it doesn't make sense to compare delphi compilers to C++ as a whole. It's certainly the case that the fastest C++ compilers produce code that is much faster than delphi. Especially for maths. In fact for maths code it's astonishing how slow delphi is.
-
Might be cast to develop, but the code produced by the Delphi compilers is slow
-
What is the problem for which this is the solution?
-
1. More complicated. Depends on the type of code and the libraries. 2. Fair. 3. Not sure about that. 4. Definitely not universally true. Perhaps for Windows GUI components, but probably nothing else. 5. Don't agree at all. Don't you see that different tools are better in different settings? Surely everyone understands that.
-
Click on the word no
-
Kind of funny that this site returns a page with a link to the emba site which in turn is a 404. Well, actually it's a 503 but whatever. So even if delphi isn't dead, isdelphidead.com is dead. A meta death if you will.
-
It's broadly accurate I'd say. What you should ask is the reverse, what advantages delphi has compared to python. For what it is worth I use both delphi and python. For some tasks one is better, for some the other is better. And I use a number of other languages too. Use the the tool that matches the job. In fact my product has a python api and can also host embedded python.
-
@pyscripter do you know if it's reasonable to implement the python mapping protocol on the Delphi side so that from python it looks like a Python mapping?
-
Consider a large dictionary with, for sake of argument, 1 million items in it. Suppose in Python you wanted to write value = foo[name] Now if foo was actually in your Delphi code, and backed by a Delphi dictionary, do you really want to populate a new Python dict with 1 million items, then perform the lookup in Python, and then throw away that dictionary. Wouldn't it be better to just ask Delphi to perform the lookup. This is what I mean what I talk about the mapping protocol. But it's entirely possible that I have misunderstood what you actually want to do!
-
Do you want to create a new instance of Python dict every time the property is called? Or aren't you looking to implement the Python mapping protocol so that Python has something that behaves like a dict, but actually just reflects the underlying Delphi object?
-
What happens to an exception raised in OnCreate? EDIT: I was curious. This is what happens: procedure TCustomForm.DoCreate; begin if Assigned(FOnCreate) then try FOnCreate(Self); except if not HandleCreateException then raise; end; if fsVisible in FFormState then Visible := True; end; function TCustomForm.HandleCreateException: Boolean; begin Application.HandleException(Self); Result := True; end; So exceptions are handled by a top level handler, and then excecution continues. This feels like quite a strange design choice to me. Swallowing exceptions feels odd. You can change this behaviour by overriding the dynamic method HandleCreateException to return False. Like @dummzeuch I never use OnCreate or OnDestroy.
-
MainFormOnTaskbar doesn't do anything very funny, and it doesn't make your window be a tool window.
-
Yes, that is fair. I'm tempted to get a third monitor to run at 96dpi for that purpose!
-
An aside, but what would be the reasons for running the IDE dpi unaware?
-
LinkedList pointer implementation gives bad results!
David Heffernan replied to Giorgi Chapidze's topic in Algorithms, Data Structures and Class Design
You did- 19 replies
-
- data structures
- pointers
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
LinkedList pointer implementation gives bad results!
David Heffernan replied to Giorgi Chapidze's topic in Algorithms, Data Structures and Class Design
Indexing is fast- 19 replies
-
- data structures
- pointers
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Quite confused about how to save a project
David Heffernan replied to 357mag's topic in General Help
You mean Visual Studio? I think VS is a lot more robust and stable than RAD Studio which crashes a lot. -
OK, there seem to be two questions asked by @Henry Olive The first one doesn't have any mention of a database, but has code that does not compile. The second question has database but we don't know what the values are. @Henry Olive you can't get a definitive answer unless we have precise details of what the data is. One thing we can say is that floating point multiplication is correct in Delphi.
-
This is fair. I looked at the first couple which are UTF-8, and then assumed they all were. But a couple of them aren't. Not implausible that the Delphi code in the OP is wrong though.
-
Where in the question is a database mentioned?
-
What language is this? It's not Delphi. Also, your expectation is incorrect. This is what Python says the right answer is: >>> 66.3333 * 1.5 99.49994999999998 I expect that if you showed your actual code, it would be clear what is going on.