Sherlock

It works for me as well. Just sayin'...

There is an iOS simulator via XCode available on the Mac you'll need to package and sign the app anyway. But if you don't want to buy a Mac (Minis are quite cheap though), you can rent a Mac online via services like MacInCloud, MacStadium or OakHost just to name a few.

You might consider adding scanning exemptions. Folders, that should not be scanned, because of high performance penalties. But you should keep an eye on those folders by other means.

Except carrying the rig around. *SCNR*

So I built a list of data grouped by devices where this data came from. Each device gets his own header in a TListView followed by its data. Pretty simple and straightforward. Now those lists may get long in total but also per device so I would like to be able to click on a header to collapse its list of data. I'm pretty sure VCL.TListView can do that. FMX.TListView...not so much. At least not that I'm aware of. I'm already having a hard time at getting the click event from a header. All TListViewItems with Purpose set to TListItemPurpose.Header sadly wont fire the OnItemClick event. Did I overlook something or other in the documentation? Anybody have a suggestion as to how this can be accomplished. Thanks in advance.

To expand (or perhaps reiterate) that answer: Components are not installed (or even bought) just to have them. If during programming you discover you would benefit from a ready to use component for some functionality over writing it yourself then you should consult the internet or perhaps this forum on where to find such a component. Event hen, if it is a commercial component, you might want to calculate the cost benefit over writing it yourself. Furthermore it is most often preferable to have sources for components to ensure their use over time.

I think it would be fair to say that Windows on ARM is not for legacy environments. It is intended for new mainstream devices. So no immediate support for decades old printers and other old hardware should be expected. However(!) as soon as it gets more traction I expect that to change.

You should rather read that as "they will open up the next major construction site as soon as there is money and manpower available, and it will take several releases until it is usable"...and even that should be taken with a grain of salt.

@oeko11 In English please...

Perhaps this will cause the DOGE to rethink their plans for COBOL (*) ...as a matter of fact I'm sure of it. (*) https://www.wired.com/story/doge-rebuild-social-security-administration-cobol-benefits/

So, I've been kept from doing things by this little, trivial problem. I've been trying to sign an msix package for days now, and am getting nowhere. I can sign Win32 and Win64 executables just fine, Delphi will create unsigned msix packages just as good. But I just can't for the life of me sign an msix. I always get the same error message, it does not matter, if this package contains my application or just a simple dummy, or if it is win32 or win64: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\bin\10.0.26100.0\x64\signtool.exe" sign /v /a /fd SHA256 C:\Win\SignTest\Win64\Release\SignTest\bin\SignTest.msix The following certificate was selected: Issued to: My Company Issued by: Certum Extended Validation Code Signing 2021 CA Expires: Sat Jan 08 12:11:18 2028 SHA1 hash: E7C16794EA23F573DE3EA32B5B564717CE84CC75 Done Adding Additional Store SignTool Error: This file format cannot be signed because it is not recognized. SignTool Error: An error occurred while attempting to sign: C:\Win\SignTest\Win64\Release\SignTest\bin\SignTest.msix Number of files successfully Signed: 0 Number of warnings: 0 Number of errors: 1 I even built the msix externally with the makeappx tool from the SDK, that works just fine (as it should, Delphi uses it as well), but in the end...same error as above as soon as I want to sign the package. The AppManifest.xml is in good shape, syntactically and content-wise. The only assets are two png Icons that can be read just fine. The executable itself can be signed with no trouble at all. What am I missing?

OK, so good news: I finally got it. Thanks to "msix hero" an OS tool specifically made for everything msix. https://github.com/marcinotorowski/MSIX-Hero. It just signed my little test project right away. Now I can go on working. Thanks everyone for your contributions and support.

That site has been up for a week. You can work fast with Delphi, but you can't work magic.

How does this construct work on Windows? As expected?

Oh, that sounds great. For a test run, I downloaded the installer and am quite overwhelmed by the further needs (service user, SSL-certificate, Server) to run the "server". For a small test if my msix could be signed by this, it seems quite the overkill. 😞

I have, and that uses an older version of signtool: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\App Certification Kit\signtool.exe" sign /v /a /fd SHA256 C:\Win\SignTest\Win64\Release\SignTest\bin\SignTest.msix The following certificate was selected: Issued to: My Company Issued by: Certum Extended Validation Code Signing 2021 CA Expires: Sat Jan 08 12:11:18 2028 SHA1 hash: E7C16794EA23F573DE3EA32B5B564717CE84CC75 Done Adding Additional Store SignTool Error: An unexpected internal error has occurred. Error information: "Error: SignerSign() failed." (-2147024885/0x8007000b) File version is 10.0.19041.685. I'm using 10.0.26100.0 which at least gives a slightly better error message.

I actually don't want to upload to the store. I need this to be able to create a Kiosk application for Windows 10/11. At least that is how I understand what I have found on the net so far. msix is not a must, but recommended. Also signed msix is not a must, but from a customers POV nice to have. Thanks @Patrick PREMARTIN for the /tr hint. I just shortened the command for ease of use. I really hope once the easy signature works, adding the time server will not be an issue.

Well, I might be way out on a limb here, but how your product was developed is of no concern to your potential customers. So just look how others have started their software business. Here is a reddit thread(?) on that subject.

There are always remote connection possibilities as a compromise. I firmly believe an unfixed product can cost more than a trip for two guys, that know their stuff, to find out what the hell is going on.

Not much since 2022. Sadly I just now got interested in the subject. So I'm putting my hopes on @Mark NZs efforts.

In all my years I saw this happen countless times and never had a name for it. Thank you.

Thanks for the quick glance at the subject. I feel it to be important to know which AIs you have tried out though. Especially for the more specific tasks like bug hunting or performance tweaks. A comparison would have been cool, for any of those tasks which AIs shine and which don't.

What does opinionated mean in this context?

The GExperts formatter or the built-in one? For the latter see here: https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/Sydney/en/Formatter.EXE,_the_Command_Line_Formatter For the former, it should be as easy as calling GExpertsFormatter.exe <YOURFILE_HERE>