Lars Fosdal

Known issue: https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-15908

Another interesting tool set: https://platform.uno/blog/the-rise-of-c-markup-for-cross-platform-development/

Something that is often overlooked is to limit the redraw frequency. If you redraw the display on every update and there are many updates per second, you may save a lot of time on triggering the invalidate at a capped rate, i.e. not do a full redraw every time, but update once every fixed time interval. Unless you are doing video processing - a redraw at maximum twice per second should be more than sufficient?

My interpretation: This is (string which need to (remove) -> This is This is (string) which (string) need to (remove) -> This is which need to

According to some googling, there appears to be methods of converting a .cer file to a .pfx file.

Staying up-to-date, with the latest stable versions of your libraries, is usually a good idea! If you have proper unit and integration tests, keeping current should be low risk.

@corneliusdavid Perhaps for solo developers, but for a corporate team I would struggle if I was to defend it as a choice.

Who would select to use a closed source backend that doesn't scale, when there are multiple options - of which several have a free tier?

VS Code + C# Dev Kit + .NET MAUI extension for C# Dev Kit is pretty cool. .NET cross platform GUI development on Windows, Mac & Linux. Your Operating System Supported Target DEBUG Platforms Windows Windows, Android macOS Android, iOS, macOS Linux Android You can argue that this is not an editor capability - but well, it is a pretty nifty editor that allows pretty nifty integrations. See also

Ok, that is pretty neat!

Tools | Options | Debugger | Event Log Event Log Options - RAD Studio (embarcadero.com)

It has progressed to the Bronze Age...

Odd - we also use the TMS VCL UI Pack - but I've never noticed that problem when having two Delphi versions installed in parallel. Perhaps because we don't use runtime packages in our code?

I love BC, but using GitKraken, the built in comparer there is pretty nice as well.

I've used Peganza Analyzer every time I had to get to know a new code base. Now, I haven't changed jobs for a long time - so the last license I have is for PA v. 4.x. Perhaps it is time to get the Expert? Then again - I write a lot less Delphi code these days, as work pushes me in different directions.

@corneliusdavid I replaced shortest with most readable years ago. 😛

Result := MyString StartPos := Pos('<', Result); if StartPos > 0 then Delete(Result, StartPos, Pos('>', Result) - StartPos + 1); Something like this? Note that it doesn't handle a missing '>', nor does it trim.

Featurewise - how does Peganza Pascal Expert hold up to TMS FixInsight?

Two and a half year later... I still want the above.

Perusing the source code, it appears that a Print capability is supported. Regular FMX doesn't have print preview, so I doubt there is SKIA support for that.

I bet that many of those will also recognize the western calendar years. Brgds, a Wood Dragon.

Ref, next major version of Delphi... Triskaidekaphobia IS to be trifled with 😛 I do wish more companies would simply adopt a calendar centric version. RAD Studio <year>.<release>.<patch>.<build> I also wish that the minor releases could be installed in parallel!

I don't use packages except those that exist by default compile time, so I haven't really seen it as a massive problem, but yes - any list that needs a scrollbar, probably also needs a filter.

Not to forget, FMX+SKIA+LOTTIE files.