dummzeuch

Talking about alternative controls: There is also TStringGrid/TDrawGrid + owner drawing. There are various examples on how to add additional controls to the cells. Not sure whether it fits the bill though.

I don't remember ever hearing how the name came to be, but since Gerald was the guy who started the tool in the 1990ies, it's likely that he named it after himself. Time to call it TExperts then... (Just kidding)

It could be an option to have a (restricted access) repository somewere with the RTL/VCL code where "the community" collects patches for everybody to use. But that poses several questions: Which versions of the RTL/VCL are maintained there? Only ever the latest one? But what about people who are stuck with older versions for whatever reason? What about forward- and backporting fixes if multple RTL/VCL versions are maintained? Who maintains it? This/ese person(s) would be the gate keeper(s) to proposed patches. Who grants / revokes access and on which criteria? Is every Delphi customer allowed access, even if he only ever bought Delphi 1? Or is it restricted to the version(s) he bought? How does he prove that? Even if only the latest RTL/VCL is maintained, what about the .x.y Delphi releases? These are of lately only available to customers with subscription. I think that could be quickly become a nightmare for the maintainer(s), not just the technical issues, but even more the legal issues.

GExperts adds a button which opens an explorer window. You still can't copy the full file name though, just the directory. But adding a read only edit field would be possible too...

Are you aware that this is neither the embarcadero support forum, nor the quality portal? If you encounter bugs, you should file bug reports in the latter.

Works for me. It has a minimum size though. Ooops, no, you are right. That's a bug. I even think I reported that one before.

Scaling bugs are sometimes hard to track down because they can depend on hardware (number of monitors and their resolution), operating system (Do you test your programs on Windows 7, 8.1 and the various current versions of Windows 10?) and user settings. I have been bitten by these several times and most of my programs only run on Windows XP, 7 and 8.1 (I develop on 8.1). Windows 10 was only recently added to the mix and has caused quite some headaches (The parent company switched to Windows 10 and nobody bothered to check whether our programs are compatible to Windows 10. In contrast they were worried if the measurement hardware's power consumption might overload the new notebook computers. That was never an issue. </rant>).

Fun fact: There was a prototype Delphi compiler that created JVM code. That was back when the Borland JBuilder still existed (about 20 years ago).

I have just discovered a bug in TJvCustomAppIniStorage.DeleteSubTreeInt and fixed it. So now I would like to contribute it back to the JVCL. Just so I am sure I understand what I need to do to create a pull request for a bugfix in the JVCL: Create a GitHub account (done) Create a repository on GitHub Clone the existing JVCL repository to a local directory using git Change the parent repository to my repository somehow on the command line Make the change Commit and push it to my repository Somehow (I am not quite sure how yet), create a pull request on that using the github website. And all that so somebody can actually look at it and decide that it is a bug and copy my code to fix it? Is it really that complicated or am I missing something here?

That's just the thing: I don't really want to use a pull request, I'd rather send a patch. But I was told by one of the maintainers that he won't accept a patch but only pull requests. So I tried, and after realizing how much work that involves for even a one liner, I will probably no longer bother and phase out or at least reduce the use of the Jedi code at work.

Or in other words: In order to create a pull request, you must first become a master of git. It's really annoying that it is that complicated. A pull request basically is a patch, with a comment. Something that would be possible to create with a text editor (at least for the simple cases I am talking about). Today I found lots of issues which I fixed with my local copy of jvcl / jcl years ago. I am sure I filed bug reports including patches back then. Aparently nobody ever looked at them, because they are still there in the current version. Examples: * Missing raise for a ESomeException.Create * missing Create in raise ESomeException(SomeString) I get the impression that "Project Jedi" nowadays is down to a single person or maybe two (I see commits by obones and ahausladen) who are simply swamped with requests. And that's not just Jedi, there is also dxgettext which is unmaintained for all practical purposes (I have been the only contributor for years and that's only because I still have got write access to the repository, which is more of an accident than planned, and I only sometimes make changes to it because that's the tool we use at work). Other projects are obviously unmaintained. My impression is that there may still be many Delphi developers, maybe their number is even raising, but the "Delphi Community" of 20 years ago no longer exists. </rant>

Hm, my pull request is still open, but at least it has gotten some comments. JVCL seems rather inactive nowadays. Now, I would like to add another pull request for the same file but an unrelated change. Again I seem to be too stupid to do that. Every time I try it I end up with the existing pull request.

Actually, since qry.next will be executed at the end of the loop, I think the C style for loop syntax is inconsistent. (For whatever reason I cannot delete the first code section of the quoted text on mobile.)

There is also the GExperts Convert Strings editor expert. Unfortunately I just realized that it does not cover this excact case. Hm, time for an improvement: Add a suffix in addition to the existing prefix option for each line. Btw: Another solution would be to create a keyboard macro for this case. I would require one Shift+Ctrl+P keypress per line though (still better than repeating the required key sequences for every line). I have attached such a macro in case anybody is interested. It can be imported into the Keyboard Macro Manager. AppendComma.gxm

So is trying to get the Delphi compiler open sourced.

If you have never used a goto, you have never written complex code. 😉 (I usually prefer Exit over goto, but Exit is also considered evil.)

I won't disagree here.

Not only IT-designers. It's designers <period>. Show me an unusable product and in 90% it will turn out that it was perfectly usable when the engineers finished. And then the designers ruined it. There used to be a credo "form follows function", but today it's "it doesn't matter whether it works, let's make it flashy." </rant>

While the Component to code expert works with many controls, it does by no means support every single one. But it's good enough for most use cases.

I usually just give them the "disabled" color (ParentColor = True). But of course nowadays with Windows 10 that is nearly indistinguishable from the normal state.

As I wrote: That's what I mean by active. The lurkers are an important part of a community as well as those who are posting. The people who sign up and then never log in again don't count (is there a good English translation for "Karteileichen"?).

Shameless self promotion: On StackOverflow somebody asked the question in the title and I answered it. And as you might have guessed, I am might proud of having had that idea. It might be interesting to know that this is how GExperts fixes some of the IDE bugs and enhances some forms: It creates a TComponent descendant which hooks some events of the form to implement the fixes or enhancements. And since it is added to the form, it automatically gests freed in the form’s destructor. https://blog.dummzeuch.de/2019/04/03/extend-the-event-onclick-of-all-menuitems-in-the-screen-to-execute-another-block-of-code/

Is there also a statistics about active members? Those that visited at least once and those who posted at least once in the last month? I have got the feeling that even though the number of members is still raising, the activity is not raising but actually falling.

Just in time before April fools day 2019 there is the new GExperts release (it’s still 2019-03-30 so you are safe 😉 ). Please be aware that I mostly work with Delphi 2007, so this version can be regarded as tested quite well, followed by Delphi XE2. The others are only known to compile and new features are usually tested superficially with all versions. This is particularly true for Delphi 6/7 and 2005/2006. If you want to help by testing new versions before I release them, please contact me [...] https://blog.dummzeuch.de/2019/03/30/gexperts-1-3-13-experimental-twm-2019-03-30-released/

I had to look them up myself, so it took a while but here they are, the changes, bugfixes and improvements between the GExperts 1.3.12 (released 2018-12-22) and 1.3.13 (released yesterday, 2019-03-30😞 https://blog.dummzeuch.de/2019/03/31/changes-between-gexperts-1-3-12-and-1-3-13/