Jump to content

FredS

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    430

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by FredS

  5. Posted

    26 minutes ago, Darian Miller said:

    I think there is a little more buzz today

     

    Could be, certainly there was a window of opportunity with the Community Edition.. however that dimmed quickly as bug reports spiked and waited.. still waiting..

     

     

  7. Posted

    4 hours ago, Lars Fosdal said:

    my subscription renewal increases the chance

     

    Yet a good chunk of users with subscriptions are sticking with Berlin or even earlier..  certainly since 2015 debugging and related issues are worse/dangerous.. just a few days ago I saw `ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown` fails in 10.4 with Patch.. surprise.. never mind the ongoing saga of users unable to move their paid versions to new hardware..

     

  9. Posted · Edited by FredS

    35 minutes ago, Mahdi Safsafi said:

    a patch to fix the leak

     

    Thanks, Works for me..

     

    Unfortunately when I turn on MadExcept 'Instantly Crash on Over/Under-Run' I still get exceptions: 

    DUnitX - [DUnitX.TestDFX.exe] - Starting Tests.

.E.E.E.E.....E.E.E.E..

Tests Found   : 11
Tests Ignored : 0
Tests Passed  : 3
Tests Leaked  : 0
Tests Failed  : 0
Tests Errored : 8

Tests With Errors

  uTest.TDDetours.Test1
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

  uTest.TDDetours.Test2
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

  uTest.TDDetours.Test3
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

  uTest.TDDetours.Test4
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

  DFX.Win.Hooks.DUnitX.Tests.THooksTests.TestHookPublicMethod
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

  DFX.Win.Hooks.DUnitX.Tests.THooksTests.TestHookPublicVirtualMethod.UseRtti
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

  DFX.Win.Hooks.DUnitX.Tests.THooksTests.TestHookPublicVirtualMethod.UseMockup
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

  DFX.Win.Hooks.DUnitX.Tests.THooksTests.TestHookPrivateVirtualMethod
  Message: Access violation at address 0000000067104A2F in module 'madExcept64.dll'. Read of address 0000000000000000

     

     

  10. Posted

    Hi,

     

    After implementing v2.2 and executing my own DUnitX tests I get a Memory Leak in Berlin.

    I can reproduce this with Sydney and MadExcept, oddly no Memory Leak by simply setting `ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown := True` in Sydney..
    In addition, turning on MadExcept Leak Test causes exceptions..

     

    These changes where made to uTest to duplicate the issue: 

    var
  TDDetoursTrampolineAdd: TAdd = nil;
  
procedure TDDetours.Setup;
var LTransaction : THandle;
begin
  ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown := True;
  LTransaction := DDetours.BeginTransaction;
  TDDetoursTrampolineAdd := InterceptCreate(@Add, @InterceptAdd);
  DDetours.EndTransaction(LTransaction);
end;

procedure TDDetours.TearDown;
var LTransaction : THandle;
begin
  LTransaction := DDetours.BeginTransaction;
  InterceptRemove(@TDDetoursTrampolineAdd);
  DDetours.EndTransaction(LTransaction);
end;

      

    allocation number: 11072
program up time: 1.07 s
type: GetMem
address: $2c9f820
size: 24
access rights: read/write

main thread ($b74):
671a5da7 madExcept32.dll madExceptDbg       1743 GetMemCallback
0041463e Test.exe        System            39806 GetMemory
006e4ce1 Test.exe        DDetours           2595 BeginTransaction
006ab856 Test.exe        DUnitX.TestRunner       TDUnitXTestRunner.Loggers_TeardownTest
006e5836 Test.exe        uTest               100 TDDetours.TearDown
006ab0ca Test.exe        DUnitX.TestRunner       TDUnitXTestRunner.ExecuteTestTearDown
006aadc7 Test.exe        DUnitX.TestRunner       TDUnitXTestRunner.ExecuteTests
006aa37e Test.exe        DUnitX.TestRunner       TDUnitXTestRunner.ExecuteFixtures
006aa3ab Test.exe        DUnitX.TestRunner       TDUnitXTestRunner.ExecuteFixtures
006aa010 Test.exe        DUnitX.TestRunner       TDUnitXTestRunner.Execute
006ee2ca Test.exe        Test                 48 initialization
7507343b kernel32.dll                            BaseThreadInitThunk

memory dump: 
02c9f820  34 0c 00 00 30 0e 00 00 - 9b 9e 73 f3 50 f8 f2 e9  4...0.....s.P...
02c9f830  9a 53 61 bd 93 e4 94 be

     

  14. Posted · Edited by FredS

    21 minutes ago, Anders Melander said:

    I haven't encountered any issues that I can pin on Windows 7

    @Anders Melander

    Yup, certainly no issues not already reported except maybe that the History list box is all black and can't be used.. since I haven't seen this reported I'm not sure if its W7 or RDP..
    All in all RDP'ing is better out of the box in 10.4, 10.3 was useless without a fix from Andreas..

     

  15. Posted

    10 hours ago, dummzeuch said:

    I can't meaningfully compare them

     

    It's faster especially when you are only enumerating folders..

     

    To do a real test one would have to access remote ADMIN$ shares, something like a 2012 server or newer with a huge directory tree..
    Run a few of those on Azure and run them simultaneously (multi-threaded).. but not in 10.4 .. being able to retrieve the data in large chunks makes enough of a difference..

     

     

  17. Posted

    On 5/29/2020 at 12:34 PM, Stéphane Wierzbicki said:

    Waiting now for Andreas to fix this

     

    After a couple of clicks on components the structure window no longer follows your selection.
    Right about then I realized that the structure window 'Find' control comes from DDevExtensions (@AndyHTech).. 🙂

  18. Posted

    2 hours ago, dummzeuch said:

    several times already

    I've seen it as a hint 'LSP has stopped working' or something similar.

    Only in one unit so far.. apparently new declarations in Winapi.Windows for some structures duplicated JwaWindows and that did it.

     

    ErrorInsight fails when you alter something and Codeinsight breaks after a couple of debug sessions..
     

    But the most annoying is the keyboard.. maybe its because I'm trial running on an Unsupported OS (Windows 7) 🙂

     

     

  20. Posted

    12 minutes ago, Kas Ob. said:

    after a given amount of time you stop being a current paying customer, you lose access or download options.

    That part sounds fair enough to me..

     

    More troubling is that the New Embarcadero Licenses and Download Portal still has no method of handling license bumps as outlined by the post above yours.
    As it sits now I can be responsible and burn an ISO or make backups but I can't find a legal way to move my installation..

     

     

    • Like 1

  21. Posted

    42 minutes ago, Alexander Elagin said:

    assign myself somewhere

    I'm also Primary contact and there has never been another, the email hasn't changed from Godzilla, yet nada..

     

    Not that I was interested but some bot shouldn't know that 🙂

    • Like 1

  24. Posted

    12 hours ago, Sherlock said:

    what code should have is a comment explaining the why

    Having come back to code from last century I now comment things that may require additional time to read.
    Even just a one liner helps when you scan code. I also limit the use of 'With', had some of that a few levels deep before 🙂

     

×