Attila Kovacs

just for curiosity what happens if you write in the uses list : uses .... Main.pas in 'src\frm\Main.pas'; if it helps then you have an other main.pas in your search path and you should be able to open it with ctrl-click on the unit name in the uses list.

@Bill Meyer Not really.. It was something like leaky-abstraction or similar can't recall.

@Dalija Prasnikar What what the blog post about the leaking strings again? I can't find it anymore.

I'd also check the host os's event viewer. It could be also a licensing issue.

sqlsrv32.dll is ODBC driver, sqlncli11.dll is native driver, there must be a setting in FD how to connect. Unidac hat at least 5 different methods.

Is there any built in/3rd party dockable form where the opened projects are listed and I could build/run/unattended run with a single click? Like Project1 [Build] [Run] [RunUA] Project2 [Build] [Run] [RunUA] etc...

@Sherlock It's not that hard but we do not want to rewrite the IDE from scratch, do we? 😄

@Ian Branch I have no idea, I would have to search for it.

It's a "known bug". Only the compiler supports the new inline syntax, the IDE still doesn't.

Well, let's do the math!

@Stefan Glienke People tend to forget about comfort feeling 😄 Joking aside, I've here a client/server thingy where I have to do things parallel and debug them, so yes, it's a temporary discomfort to scroll up and down in the projects window like a poisoned mouse to find the node which has this context menu. But I like your chart. It's just too practical. 😉

@dummzeuch ctrl-shift-f9 / run without debug

@Sherlock It's too slow for me.

I'm more eco-friendly so I just took the digital version 😉

It's a bullsh@t. The doc is a big ~, the mimicked java/.net implementation is a ~, and the parameter name "startIndex" is a ~. It should be called lastIndex as the function name reflects only an index lookup, and not any search in some direction, and mostly not the underlying implementation.

@Sherlock I mean "Aussteigen, Einsteigen, Geht" 😄

öööööööö, if not, you could try an AEG. 😉

@dummzeuch <joke> It's pretty fine to use Delphi's built in Round in a banking application. </joke>

*phew* 🙂

@Uwe Raabe Phuhhh, this is just mapping numbers into an enum. Your helper actually is like the following code, with obfuscated names. I don't think I want to debug such code. It even works on negative values in the list. TEnum = (five, nine, fourteen, thousand) enum.AsInteger := five.AsInteger + nine.AsInteger; if enum = fourteen then begin Writeln('Hooray!'); end There must be a special use-case to do this, I suppose.

try something with dot pitch >= 0.3mm ( <~83DPI ), or a 4K with similar pixel-group size in 200% scaling

I was always pissed because of the property editor and its incapability to helping the work, so I made this extra filter-box. It has a little discomfort as the Property Editor steals the focus on the first click, I'll check what can I do if I find some time. Also, adding/deleting/storing the predefined filters are unimplemented yet. If someone feels the power to get it done, don't hesitate to apply.

@dummzeuch Sorry, I forgot them. As everybody every time... Btw. I just found out that it's not working if the selection is in a popup window like columns of a grid etc... I had no time yet to figure out what the problem is. Maybe you will have more ideas as me..

That's what I was referring to in your previous post https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4950129/delphi-for-in-loop-set-enumeration-order and https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1600575/iterate-through-items-in-an-enumeration-in-delphi

@Tommi Prami Sorry, I'm not touching the property editor at all, so no coloring or any drawing possible. It has a filter interface where I can decide what should be in the list and what not. However, one could easily filter those properties which are declared only in the component class, or in the last 2 classes (TCustomXXX, but I think there are no published properties), or build a tree and select which ones you want to see. So could you have a clear overview of the components own properties. Edit: I made a little test and It's not that useful as I thought: (%'s represent the class depth (parents))