Rollo62 558 Posted 5 hours ago Hi there, I'm wondering if there have been any changes to the Now() function recently, related to the timer resolution. The Now() returnd TDateTime with Millisecond resolution, while officially they state the resolution is only 1 Sec. https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/Athens/en/System.SysUtils.Now Note: Although TDateTime values can represent milliseconds, Now is accurate only to the nearest second. This topic is quite old, so already here discussed on SO https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14573617/how-accurate-is-delphis-now-timestamp With GetTimerTick() I can reach 7-16ms timer resolution, basically. !! And before somebody recommends high performance: I'm perfectly fine with the 15ms resolution and I want to use it. With Now() I can see similar results on all platforms, according to my tests, which is much better than the 1 Sec. stated in the docs, pretty much like the 7-16ms resolution. So what does the 1 Sec. really mean then, is this the worst-case scenario that might happen, while its perfectly 15ms all day long? Perhaps there have been changed something recently, in Delphi or Windows or other Platforms? Windows: System.SysUtils.Now(): is based on GetLocalTime(SystemTime); https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/windows/win32/api/sysinfoapi/nf-sysinfoapi-getlocaltime https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/windows/win32/api/minwinbase/ns-minwinbase-systemtime - I cannot find any restrictions like 1 Sec. there, not even a 15ms note. TThread.GetTickCount64: is based in GetTickCount64; https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/sysinfoapi/nf-sysinfoapi-gettickcount64 - Which also had no restrictions, aside the known 15ms resolution. Macos/iOS: mach_absolute_time Android/Linux: clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, @res); Other Platforms were way beyond these accuracy - All should reach 1ms without problem. From the behaviour I can see in my tests, I would assume that Now() reaches the same 15ms resolution meanwhile on my current Win11 PC. Is this a safe assumpttion, or are there any other known restriction, which officially state the 1 Sec. resolution? This is why I think the following - Now() and GetTickCount64 both reach about 15ms resolution - Perhaps Now() could show resolution 1 Sec. in rare cases, e.g. under heavy load. - If that is true, I would also expect that also GetTickCount64() might break down to 1 Sec. resolution, under heavy load. Maybe somebody can clarify the situation, under current Windows versions, are there any official statements, aside from Embarcadero's docs? If there were such insights for the other platforms, I'm happy to see them too, but only Windows seems to be worst here. Share this post Link to post
shineworld 79 Posted 4 hours ago (edited) I work only on Windows but to get precise timings (below 1ms of accuracy) I use QueryPerformanceFrequency() and QueryPerformanceCounter(). In case precise timings are not available I switch to timeGetTime() A messy unit is in attachment. PS: You can improve Windwos timeGetTime, gettickcount and sleep (DELPHI IDE does that) with: program XXX; uses System.SysUtils, Winapi.MMSystem, ...; {$R *.res} var TimeCaps: TTimeCaps; NeedToChangeTimerPrecsion: Boolean; begin // starts high precision timer if timeGetDevCaps(@TimeCaps, SizeOf(TTimeCaps)) = TIMERR_NOERROR then NeedToChangeTimerPrecsion := timeBeginPeriod(TimeCaps.wPeriodMin) = TIMERR_NOERROR else NeedToChangeTimerPrecsion := False; // initializes and runs application Application.Initialize; ...; Application.Run; // stops high precision timer if NeedToChangeTimerPrecsion then timeEndPeriod(TimeCaps.wPeriodMin); end. osTimeUtils.pas Edited 4 hours ago by shineworld Share this post Link to post
Rollo62 558 Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Like said, I know about performance counters, but I want to use Now() and GetTimerTick64() for other tasks, accepting the 15ms tolerances. The question is about, what the Now() 1 Sec. tolerance really means nowadays, is it gone or is it a valid case? Edited 4 hours ago by Rollo62 Share this post Link to post
shineworld 79 Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Mmmm, I've tried a simple console program in Athens 12: program Project4; {$APPTYPE CONSOLE} {$R *.res} uses System.SysUtils, System.DateUtils, Winapi.Windows; var I: Integer; T1: Int64; T2: Int64; TD: Double; D1: TDateTime; D2: TDateTime; DiffMs: Int64; Frequency: Int64; function Delay: Integer; var I: Integer; begin Result := 0; for I := 0 to 1000000 do Inc(Result); end; begin FormatSettings.DecimalSeparator := '.'; FormatSettings.ThousandSeparator := ','; try QueryPerformanceFrequency(Frequency); D1 := Now(); QueryPerformanceCounter(T1); Delay; D2 := Now(); QueryPerformanceCounter(T2); TD := (T2 - T1) * 1000 / Frequency; DiffMs := MilliSecondsBetween(D2, D1); Writeln(Format('Now() delta = %d ms', [DiffMs])); Writeln(Format('QueryPerformance delta = %f ms', [TD])); except on E: Exception do Writeln(E.ClassName, ': ', E.Message); end; end. Result: Now() delta = 2 ms QueryPerformance delta = 2.15 ms The Delay is empirical, necessary just to have a little delay. Now() seems to capture 2ms of delta. Increasing delay of 10: Now() delta = 17 ms QueryPerformance delta = 16.42 ms I don't know why they report 1 sec of precision in the documentation, but if it can be so, is terribile, because my OPC UA server timings are based on TDateTime and 1ms of resolutions is already 10 time bigger than OPC-UA tick of 100ns. Edited 3 hours ago by shineworld Share this post Link to post
Rollo62 558 Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Thanks for the proposals, but again, I'm not looking for QueryPerformanceCounter, but about the Now(); behaviour. Moreover I'm looking for a cross-platform sulution, not Windows alone. I dont need high performance for this task, the 15ms would be fine. It could be even OK, if 1 Sec., if this happens only very very rare ( but I would like to avoid that ). I hope that someone knows exactly where the 1 Sec. comes from and what conditions will make it to show up. Edited 2 hours ago by Rollo62 Share this post Link to post
EugeneK 22 Posted 1 hour ago You can check System.Diagnostics.TStopWatch it is cross platform and high-precision Share this post Link to post