Fast Base64 encode/decode

[mikerabat 20]

I just released an assembler optimzed (AVX2 set) Base64 encoding/decoding unit.

 

check it out under
https://github.com/mikerabat/fastbase64/

 

My reference implementation achieves up to 10 times speedup against the reference Indy implementation.

Let me know what you think or if you encounter some errors...

[Stefan Glienke 2002]

21 minutes ago, mikerabat said:

Let me know what you think or if you encounter some errors...

Personally, I would find it way more readable if you would not ifdef DELPHIAVX for every single line but simply make it two blocks, one using the avx instructions and one using db.

[mikerabat 20]

Jus FYI: That is intentional - the left side shall show the original assembler call the right side the DB translation

-> my tool, that derrives the DB statements from the assembler code does a line by line comparison.

 

[Anders Melander 1782]

2 hours ago, mikerabat said:

Jus FYI: That is intentional - the left side shall show the original assembler call the right side the DB translation

Maybe at least reformat it into two distinct columns

      {$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}vpshufb ymm1, ymm0, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Lut0];{$ELSE}db $C4,$C2,$7D,$00,$49,$20;{$ENDIF}
      {$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}vpand ymm2, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask0];{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$DB,$51,$60;{$ENDIF}
      {$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}vpand ymm1, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask2];{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$DB,$89,$A0,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
      {$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}vpmulhuw ymm2, ymm2, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask1];{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$6D,$E4,$91,$80,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
      {$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}vpmullw ymm1, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask3];{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$D5,$89,$C0,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
      {$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}vpor ymm1, ymm1, ymm2;{$ELSE}db $C5,$F5,$EB,$CA;{$ENDIF}

Like this:

{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpshufb ymm1, ymm0, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Lut0];                {$ELSE}db $C4,$C2,$7D,$00,$49,$20;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpand ymm2, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask0];			{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$DB,$51,$60;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpand ymm1, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask2];			{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$DB,$89,$A0,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpmulhuw ymm2, ymm2, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask1];		{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$6D,$E4,$91,$80,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpmullw ymm1, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask3];		{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$D5,$89,$C0,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpor ymm1, ymm1, ymm2;						{$ELSE}db $C5,$F5,$EB,$CA;{$ENDIF}

or even better:

{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpshufb         ymm1, ymm0, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Lut0];                {$ELSE}db $C4,$C2,$7D,$00,$49,$20;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpand           ymm2, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask0];		{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$DB,$51,$60;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpand           ymm1, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask2];		{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$DB,$89,$A0,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpmulhuw        ymm2, ymm2, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask1];		{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$6D,$E4,$91,$80,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpmullw         ymm1, ymm1, [r9 + TAVXEncodeConst.Mask3];		{$ELSE}db $C4,$C1,$75,$D5,$89,$C0,$00,$00,$00;{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF DELPHIAVX}      vpor            ymm1, ymm1, ymm2;					{$ELSE}db $C5,$F5,$EB,$CA;{$ENDIF}

 

Unreadable code is unmaintainable.

[David Heffernan 2345]

2 hours ago, mikerabat said:

Jus FYI: That is intentional - the left side shall show the original assembler call the right side the DB translation

-> my tool, that derrives the DB statements from the assembler code does a line by line comparison.

 

I think I'd extend the tool to produce cleaner output

[mikerabat 20]

Thanks for the input - I will beef up the tool to get at least the else part aligned on the right side 😉  that really looks nicer.

[David Heffernan 2345]

3 hours ago, mikerabat said:

Thanks for the input - I will beef up the tool to get at least the else part aligned on the right side 😉  that really looks nicer.

One thing you could easily do would be to always output the db instructions, but put the asm in comments, then it would be just as readable, but have no ifdefs

[Anders Melander 1782]

18 minutes ago, David Heffernan said:

One thing you could easily do would be to always output the db instructions, but put the asm in comments, then it would be just as readable, but have no ifdefs

...and no errors from the compiler if the asm is wrong.

[mikerabat 20]

@David Heffernan That would be against the direction I develop here - first I need the working ASM 😉 then the tool can use the disassembly to create the db instructions....