-
Content Count
1001 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
64
Posts posted by pyscripter
-
-
1 hour ago, pcoenen said:Should E.EValue contain the exit code?
It should. Please update to the latest version of P4D and try again. Then report here whether it works.
-
These two tests appear to be identical.
Parsing them leads to a call
result := TJSONNumber.Create(str);
where str = '0.1.2'
Apparently this succeeds in Delphi 10.4 but correctly fails in later versions. This is easily fixed by using TryStrToFloat before creating the TJSONNumber.
@dummzeuch I have committed a potential fix for the above10.4 failed invalid tests. Could you please try again.
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, dummzeuch said:That's TStringList.Contains which doesn't find. And that apparently was introduced in Delphi 12.
I have now replaced that call to Contains. Tested with Delphi 11.
✖ comment\after-literal-no-ws.toml: 'inf' is not a valid floating point value ✖ float\inf-and-nan.toml: 'nan' is not a valid floating point value ✖ spec-1.0.0\float-2.toml: 'inf' is not a valid floating point value Completed: 205, Succeeded: 202, Failed: 3 Completed: 529, Succeeded: 529, Failed: 0 ✓ All tests passed!
I think I can live with that. Apparently StrToFloat was extended to cope with inf, nan, and -inf in Delphi 12. In Delphi 12 you can serialize such special floating point values.
Could you please test again with Delphi 10.4 The parsing might work, but the serializer had many bugs in 10.4.
-
Backward compatibility is going to be an issue at least for the serializer part. Right now I am trying to fix Delphi 11 compatibility.
It should be possible to make the parsing staff made compatible with earlier versions of Delphi, as long as TJSONObject exists.
-
3 minutes ago, dummzeuch said:Should those from files-toml_1.1.0 also pass? They don't:
TOML 1.1 is not yet official. 1.0 is the latest TOML standard. So they are correctly rejected for now.
-
-
5 minutes ago, dummzeuch said:I downloaded the tests from
https://github.com/toml-lang/toml-test/tree/main/tests
put them into the tests subdirectory and run the Tests.dpr project.
There is no need for that, if you clone the project. You just update the submodule.
-
3 minutes ago, dummzeuch said:Is that the expected result?
Here:
Completed: 205, Succeeded: 205, Failed: 0 ✓ All tests passed! Completed: 529, Succeeded: 529, Failed: 0 ✓ All tests passed!
I can guess the issue is with the TFormatSettings in the conversion to float. I wlll fix it.
-
@dummzeuch With the permission of the original author the license has now been changed to the MIT one.
-
4
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, dummzeuch said:My only problem with that is the license: GPL simply makes it useless for me.
See https://github.com/genericptr/fpTOML/issues/5#issuecomment-2983448165
-
TOML is a "config file format for humans", that has gained a lot of traction in the python and rust communities among others. It is basically the INI file format on steroids. It compares quite well to alternative formats such as JSON, YAML and XML. Compared to JSON is way more readable and compact.
Since I could not find any Delphi library for processing TOML, I have created my own: toml-delphi.
Features:
- TOML v1.0.0 compliant.
- Passes all 734 (valid/invalid) official validation tests.
- Fast. Single stream tokenizer and lexer that doesn't use regex.
- Converts TOML documents to Delphi's RTL's TJSONObject, thus allowing for easy traversal, manipulation and query of the generated documents.
- Includes TTOMLWriter for converting TJSONObjects back to TOML.
- Provides for easy (de)serialization of Delphi objects and records from/to TOML.
This is the interface of the main unit:
TJSONObjectHelper = class helper for TJSONObject function ToTOML(MultilineStrings: Boolean = False; Indent: Integer = 4): string; procedure StreamTOML(Stream: TStream; MultilineStrings: Boolean = False; Indent: Integer = 4); procedure SaveTOMLtoFile(const FileName: string; MultilineStrings: Boolean = False; Indent: Integer = 4); class function FromTOML(const Contents: string): TJSONObject; overload; class function FromTOML(Contents: TBytes): TJSONObject; overload; class function FromTOML(Stream: TStream): TJSONObject; overload; class function FromTOMLFile(const FileName: string): TJSONObject; end; ETOMLSerializer = class(Exception); TTOMLSerializer = class class function Serialize<T>(const AValue: T): string; overload; class function Deserialize<T>(const ATOML: string): T; overload; end;
Example usage:
You can convert TOML source to TJSONObject using one of the FromTOML functions. For example to parse a TOML file you use:
var JsonObject := TJSONObject.FromTOMLFile(FileName); //or for parsing a TOML string: var JsonObject := TJSONObject.FromTOML(TOMLstring);
To convert a TJSONObject to TOML you use one of the methods ToTOML, StreamTOML or SaveTOMLToFile. For example:
TOMLString := JsonObject.ToTOML; // or JsonObject.SaveTOMLToFile(FileName);
Example serialization:
type TTestRec = record IntValue: Integer; FloatValue: double; StringValue: string; DateValue: TDateTime; ArrayValue: TArray<string>; end; procedure TestSerializer; var Rec: TTestRec; TOMLString: string; begin Rec.IntValue := 123; Rec.FloatValue := 3.14; Rec.StringValue := 'abc'; Rec.DateValue := Now; Rec.ArrayValue := ['A', 'B', 'C']; Writeln('Serialized record:'); WriteLn('=================='); TOMLString := TTOMLSerializer.Serialize(Rec); Writeln(TOMLString); Writeln('Record deserialized and serialized again:'); Writeln('========================================='); Rec := TTOMLSerializer.Deserialize<TTestRec>(TOMLString); TOMLString := TTOMLSerializer.Serialize(Rec); Writeln(TOMLString); end;
Output:
Serialized record: ================== IntValue = 123 FloatValue = 3.14 StringValue = "abc" DateValue = "2025-06-18T05:37:02.110+03:00" ArrayValue = [ "A", "B", "C" ] Record deserialized and serialized again: ========================================= IntValue = 123 FloatValue = 3.14 StringValue = "abc" DateValue = "2025-06-18T05:37:02.110+03:00" ArrayValue = [ "A", "B", "C" ]
I hope you find it useful.
-
9
-
6
-
You can do something similar in python. You can use sys.exit(n) which raises the SystemExit exception. n can be a number or a string or anything else. But if you call sys.exit(n) with different integer values then you can do the following:
try PythonEngine.ExecString(...); except on E: EPySystemExit do begin case IntToStr(e.EValue): 1: 2: end; end; end;
-
PythonEngine1.ExecStrings(lines)
will raise in exception (a subclass of EPyException) if an error occurs. If you redirecting the python output using for instance TPythonGUIInputOutput then error information is printed and you will be able to see where the error occurred including a traceback. You can also use the Traceback object to extract information about the error. If you want to handle the Exception you can use
try PythonEngine1.ExecStrings(lines); except on E: EPyException // Do whatever you want. You can use the PythonEngine1.Traceback to get information about what went wrong end
-
I guess ExecStrings raises an exception so, the event is not signalled.
You can modify ExecuteWithPython to always signal:
procedure TPyThread.ExecuteWithPython;
begintry
GetPythonEngine.ExecString(Script);finally
Event.Signal;end;
end;Don't you get the error printed when running your script? You can also use the debugger to see if/what the exception is.
Note that not all modules are compatible with PyInterpreterConfig_OWN_GIL. I suspect PIL isn't, Read the documentation about the limitations.
Does you program work with emNewState? Note that emNewInterpreter does not offer any performance advantages compared to emNewState.
Given that Demo 36 works, start from that and then gradually move towards what you want, until you find what fails. The first thing that I would test is the imports. Add:
import sys print(sys.path)
to make sure that you are using the correct version of python with your desired imports installed.
Then add your imports to see whether they work.
-
-
1 hour ago, david berneda said:Oops, you mean plugin units, or demos?
In Installing R and Python - TeeBI Documentation you say that
QuoteThe unit containing Python4Delphi classes is BI.Plugins.Python.Engine.pas
I cannot find that unit.
Also you say that:
QuoteTeeBI includes several units that implement "algorithms" (statistical and machine-learning) using the R Language and Python Scikit-Learn runtimes.
These units are located in the Sources\Algorithms folder.
That folder does not exist.
-
The plugins are missing.
-
1 hour ago, Remy Lebeau said:Did you report the problem to Embarcadero? It is either an error in the documentation, or a bug in the compiler.
Class helpers compiler or documentation error - RAD Studio Service - Jira Service Management
-
I would like to share the following in case you encounter the same issue.
Class and Record Helpers (Delphi) - RAD Studio states that:
QuoteYou can define and associate multiple helpers with a single type. However, only zero or one helper applies in any specific location in source code. The helper defined in the nearest scope will apply. Class or record helper scope is determined in the normal Delphi fashion (for example, right to left in the unit's uses clause).
Actually, this is not entirely correct. Consider the following:
Unit HelperUnit1.pas:
TObjectHelper1 = class helper for TObject procedure Test; end;
Unit2 HelperUnit2.pas:
TObjectHelper2 = class helper for TObject procedure Test; end;
Unit SupportClasses,pas:
uses HelperUnit1; type TMyClass: class end;
Unit MainUnit.pas
interface implementation uses SupportClasses, HelperUnit2; begin var MyClass:= TMyClass.Create; MyClass.Test; end;
MyClass.Test will use the HelperUnit1.TObjectHelper1.Test implementation even if HelperUnit1 is not even in scope, let alone being "in nearest scope".
So it appears that if a class helper is in scope where a class is defined, it is used unconditionally in all units of a project. If not, then what it is stated in the documentation applies.
-
2
-
-
See python4delphi/Demos/Demo36 at master · pyscripter/python4delphi for an example of using the buffer protocol to read/write numpy arrays in Delphi using the buffer protocol.
If you do not care about speed watch the video tutorials and the tutorial demos that show you how to create numpy arrays from delphi and pass them to python and back. In a similar way you can work with dataframes directly.
-
29 minutes ago, aehimself said:Does TJSonSerializer work with TObjectList and TObjectDictionary already? As far as I remember this is why I started to (de)serialize objects manually back around Delphi 10.4 but would love to automate things finally 🙂
It includes a number of converters to handle generic collections, but I think you have to add them manually:
-
Since you asked for Serializer benchmakrs:
paolo-rossi/delphi-neon: JSON Serialization library for Delphi includes a benchmark against the Rest.Json serializer and it beats it hand down:
I have replaced the Rest.Json serializer with the System.Json.Serializers TJSONSerializer. Here are the results:
So now TJsonSerializer beats Neon hands down.
TJsonSerializer looks good but it has some rough edges. To run the benchmarks I had to add a converter that handles Enumerated values as strings instead of the default integers:
type TEnumStringConverter = class(TJsonConverter) public function CanConvert(ATypeInf: PTypeInfo): Boolean; override; function ReadJson(const AReader: TJsonReader; ATypeInf: PTypeInfo; const AExistingValue: TValue; const ASerializer: TJsonSerializer): TValue; override; procedure WriteJson(const AWriter: TJsonWriter; const AValue: TValue; const ASerializer: TJsonSerializer); override; end; { TEnumStringConverter } function TEnumStringConverter.CanConvert(ATypeInf: PTypeInfo): Boolean; begin // This converter can handle any type that is an enumeration Result := (ATypeInf.Kind = TTypeKind.tkEnumeration) and (ATypeInf <> TypeInfo(Boolean)); end; function TEnumStringConverter.ReadJson(const AReader: TJsonReader; ATypeInf: PTypeInfo; const AExistingValue: TValue; const ASerializer: TJsonSerializer): TValue; var LIntValue: Integer; begin LIntValue := System.TypInfo.GetEnumValue(ATypeInf, AReader.Value.AsString); if LIntValue = -1 then // GetEnumValue returns -1 if the name is not found raise EJsonSerializationException.CreateFmt('Invalid string value "%s" for enumeration "%s".', [AExistingValue.AsString, ATypeInf.Name]); // Create a TValue of the specific enum type using its ordinal value. Result := TValue.FromOrdinal(ATypeInf, LIntValue); end; procedure TEnumStringConverter.WriteJson(const AWriter: TJsonWriter; const AValue: TValue; const ASerializer: TJsonSerializer); begin AWriter.WriteValue(System.TypInfo.GetEnumName(AValue.TypeInfo, AValue.AsOrdinal)); end;
See also:
Bummer: System.Json.Converters already includes TJsonEnumNameConverter that does the job.
-
1 hour ago, Tommi Prami said:Is there test/comparison is Objects and/or Record serialization supported and speed etc??
No. Most of the alternatives do not support serialization. Grizzy and Superobject do. Delphi offers a couple of ways. But serialization is not necessarily dependent on JSON parsing. For example NEON is using System.JSON.
-
1
-
-
hydrobyte/TestJSON: A simple project to test JSON libraries with Delphi and C++Builder. presents JSON library benchmarks comparing a large number of alternatives.
One thing that strikes me, is that the System.JSON rtl library is doing relatively well compared to the competition, both in terms of performance and in terms of JSON validation. With the exception of Find, is very competitive in all other areas.
I have seen many claims that System.JSON is very slow and that the xyz library is so many times faster. Do these benchmarks suck (like most benchmarks)? Or is it the case that System.JSON is not that bad? What is your experience?
-
5
-
1
-
Python Output
in Python4Delphi
Posted · Edited by pyscripter
For now, there are very serious limitations you need to consider when using emNewInterpreterOwnGIL to achieve true parallelism. See for instance the limitations in What’s new in Python 3.14 — Python 3.14.0b3 documentation.
Even the innocent looking print command is not thread-safe. And almost nothing can be share between the interpreters. Also there are limitations about what you can import, and P4D modules are not yet considered safe for use with emNewInterpreterOwnGIL.
This is changing with the forthcoming python 3.14. It will include a new module concurrent.interpreters that exposes the interpreters with their own GIL to pure python code. There will also be an addition of ways to communicate between the interpreters using queues. See PEP 734. So for example you could store your output to such a queue and print it when everything is finished.
But all the above is cutting edge and unless you really need it you should avoid it, If you decide to use it then make sure you fully understand the limitations and implications.
I will try to make P4D modules compatible with emNewInterpreterOwnGIL and that would at least give you the option to say add output to a Delphi string list (or something similar) protected with a global lock on the Delphi side.
Note that all the above are not related to the free-threading version of Python, which in itself is another story altogether.