What about additional free open source C++ libraries on GetIt ?

[Rolf Fankhauser 1]

I tried to install and use OpenCV under C++Builder 10.3.3 (see stack overflow), until now without success.

Wouldn't it possible that Embarcadero could make this important library available via GetIt or at least provide a short installation tutorial with working dll's and import libs ?

For Delphi there is a project on GitHub (Delphi-OpenCV) but it's an old version and I don't know if it can be used in C++Builder.

At the moment there are 15 C++ libraries available on GetIt. Not very much compared to MS VC  (ca. 800) .

I don't need 800 but it is rather frustrating if I see an interesting library but install/compiling instructions only for GCC or MS VC or just precompiled packages only for MS VC..

 

Some libraries are easier to install than OpenCV, e.g. NLopt for non-linear optimization that I tested. Would also be a candidate for GetIt.

Maybe I belong to a minority of RAD Studio users because I need many mathematical and scientific libraries and these libraries have low priority for Embarcadero. Then let me know...

[Rolf Fankhauser 1]

Here is an example for install documentation of NLopt

It would be nice to have more such documentation for important free open source libraries (with a license allowing commercial use).

Installation over GetIt would be perfect but not a must. Installing documentation would be enough.

[Roger Cigol 126]

The ease of use with open source C++ libraries is a key feature when choosing a C++ development environment. I agree with your highlighting the need for Embarcadero to direct attention to this.

[oliwe 6]

I fully agree with that.
The fact that open source libraries are not easy to use with RAD Studio or C++Builder is one of the biggest limitations. Installing via GetIt is nice, but much more important from my point of view is a reasonable support of CMake.

I think you get young programmers at school and in the universities - there you set yourself on a "favorite IDE". Without the ability to compile open source libraries, Embarcadero is out of the race when it comes to generating young talents who use RAD Studio. What a pity!

I am using VTK with RAD Studio - the only reason for that is because I am bound to the IDE with old projects. It would be cool if we put together in this thread or wherever C++ libraries that can be "somehow" compiled with RAD Studio. In cooperation with Embarcadero we should bring the open source capability forward piece by piece.

 

PS
Okay, I'm dreaming 😉

Edited April 16, 2021 by oliwe

[Roger Cigol 126]

Yes! and I firmly believe that both Newton and Einstein had good ideas [a fact] whilst dreaming [pure conjecture].

[Rolf Fankhauser 1]

@oliwe: I have already encountered VTK when I worked shortly with Paraview using some CFD software and VisIt (3D visualization of MRI slices) and recently when I was looking for a graph drawing library. Many programs and libraries are built on top of VTK.

At the moment I use Graphviz in C++Builder for drawing graphs/networks. But I use a Javascript implementation of Graphviz viz.js. There is also a COM library WinGraphviz that could be used.

[oliwe 6]

Thanks for the reference to graphviz - I will  have a look on it.
I am very satisfied with VTK, but it is very time-consuming to compile VTK with the C++Builder. Currently I am on version 7.1.1 - and it is always a pain to jump on a newer version.
Using OpenCV in GetIt or via CMake would be a big step forward also for me.

[Lars Fosdal 1828]

Would it not be up to the author on GitHub to support GetIt?
What does MS VS use? Nuget?  In that case, the logical thing would be for C++Builder to support Nuget?

[Stefan Glienke 2073]

1 hour ago, Lars Fosdal said:

Would it not be up to the author on GitHub to support GetIt?
What does MS VS use? Nuget?  In that case, the logical thing would be for C++Builder to support Nuget?

Nuget is for .Net, not for C++. C++ has a bunch of package managers but none of them is considered the de facto standard that almost everyone uses.

[Lars Fosdal 1828]

So, to get real traction for a C++ Getit, one could write a plugin for VS and flog the heck out of it on the forums...

[Stefan Glienke 2073]

3 hours ago, Lars Fosdal said:

So, to get real traction for a C++ Getit, one could write a plugin for VS and flog the heck out of it on the forums...

Because what percentage of overall C++ development is being done in Visual Studio again?

[Lars Fosdal 1828]

TBH, I do not know how much C++ is done in VS versus other IDEs.