David Heffernan 2472 Posted Wednesday at 03:26 PM (edited) Obviously Emba have trailed the new conditional operator (wish they'd call it this and not ternary, but whatever). But we've heard nothing else. So I was interested in the what's new webinar to see what else there would be. Turns out the reason nothing else has been talked about ahead of time is that there is nothing else. I didn't have high expectations, but they've managed to fall well short of them. Has anyone else seen anything worth talking about? Edited Wednesday at 03:28 PM by David Heffernan Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 03:33 PM (edited) NO Webinar 30 minutes after the supposed start: Edited Wednesday at 03:33 PM by PeterPanettone Share this post Link to post
David Heffernan 2472 Posted Wednesday at 03:37 PM 4 minutes ago, PeterPanettone said: NO Webinar 30 minutes after the supposed start: Don't worry, you aren't missing very much!! Share this post Link to post
David Heffernan 2472 Posted Wednesday at 03:41 PM 95% of this is them saying that they've updated their tools to the latest versions of the various libraries that they are built from, target. Which has to be done, but this is clearly just a maintenance release. Share this post Link to post
Lars Fosdal 1902 Posted Wednesday at 03:42 PM (edited) Some useful stuff, but YMMV. https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/Florence/en/What's_New Edited Wednesday at 03:51 PM by Lars Fosdal Added URL for What's New 1 1 Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 03:46 PM 4 minutes ago, David Heffernan said: Don't worry, you aren't missing very much!! 2 minutes ago, David Heffernan said: 95% of this is them saying that they've updated their tools to the latest versions of the various libraries that they are built from, target. Which has to be done, but this is clearly just a maintenance release. No earth-shattering innovations in 13? Doesn't Embarcadero use ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? Share this post Link to post
David Heffernan 2472 Posted Wednesday at 03:51 PM 8 minutes ago, Lars Fosdal said: Some useful stuff, but YMMV. Yeah, some bits and pieces. But I can't see anything exciting. Just a few minor convenience improvements. Share this post Link to post
Lars Fosdal 1902 Posted Wednesday at 03:57 PM 7 minutes ago, David Heffernan said: I can't see anything exciting. The C++ guys are prolly excited. I like the new operators, the new generic constraints, PushOpt/PopOpt, NameOf, Basic version support in GetIt. There is a LOT of RTL stuff as well - but that is defintively YMMV. I still wish they would have added a generic constraint for enumerated types to enable the use of Include/Exclude/In etc. Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 03:58 PM 11 minutes ago, Lars Fosdal said: Some useful stuff, but YMMV. No BUG FIXES? No Windows ARM compiler? No faster LSP server? No Visual Assist for Delphi? Share this post Link to post
Lars Fosdal 1902 Posted Wednesday at 04:04 PM I like the WebStencils, but I have no use for it... Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 04:07 PM 1 minute ago, Lars Fosdal said: I like the WebStencils, but I have no use for it... I neither. Is this a hobby project of someone at Embarcadero? Share this post Link to post
Lars Fosdal 1902 Posted Wednesday at 04:12 PM Let me moderate myself - I would have loved WebStencils 5-10-15 years ago, but now I work for a company that do advanced scalable web development, using the industry standards - which is not RADServer or WebStencils. WebStencils could be nice if you need a web UI for a Windows Service or similar, though. Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 04:19 PM (edited) 7 minutes ago, Lars Fosdal said: Let me moderate myself - I would have loved WebStencils 5-10-15 years ago, but now I work for a company that do advanced scalable web development, using the industry standards - which is not RADServer or WebStencils. WebStencils could be nice if you need a web UI for a Windows Service or similar, though. Why do they not work on things that people really need? Delphi has such great potential! You could do GREAT THINGS with Delphi! Edited Wednesday at 04:20 PM by PeterPanettone Share this post Link to post
Lars Fosdal 1902 Posted Wednesday at 04:23 PM What you really need, really depends on each person. You obviously can't satisfy everone every time. 2 Share this post Link to post
Anders Melander 2095 Posted Wednesday at 04:25 PM 1 minute ago, Lars Fosdal said: You obviously can't satisfy everone every time. But at least you can not satisfy someone every time. 1 2 Share this post Link to post
Uwe Raabe 2182 Posted Wednesday at 04:26 PM 27 minutes ago, PeterPanettone said: No BUG FIXES? Where did you read that? New features and customer reported issues fixed in RAD Studio 13.0 1 Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 04:27 PM Just now, Anders Melander said: But at least you can not satisfy someone every time. Is this an AMBIGUOUS statement? Share this post Link to post
Stefan Glienke 2169 Posted Wednesday at 04:32 PM 1 hour ago, David Heffernan said: Has anyone else seen anything worth talking about? I haven't found a critical regression in the past 24 hours. 2 4 Share this post Link to post
Anders Melander 2095 Posted Wednesday at 04:33 PM 59 minutes ago, David Heffernan said: Has anyone else seen anything worth talking about? Well, I got this one during install so I'm already a little bit "excited"... https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/threat/Trojan.Win32.Lazzzy.gen/ Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 04:50 PM 23 minutes ago, Uwe Raabe said: Where did you read that? New features and customer reported issues fixed in RAD Studio 13.0 I like the NameOf(T) compiler (magic) function. 1 Share this post Link to post
PeterPanettone 171 Posted Wednesday at 04:54 PM 19 minutes ago, Anders Melander said: Well, I got this one during install so I'm already a little bit "excited"... https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/threat/Trojan.Win32.Lazzzy.gen/ Should we switch off malware detection during Delphi 13 installation? Share this post Link to post
Patrick PREMARTIN 152 Posted Wednesday at 05:22 PM 27 minutes ago, PeterPanettone said: Should we switch off malware detection during Delphi 13 installation? No, you should not. But every program using or allowing to use AI features is subject to be recognize like an AI trojan. Kaspersky AI and the others have to learn about false (or not) positives. Share this post Link to post
Patrick PREMARTIN 152 Posted Wednesday at 05:23 PM (edited) 49 minutes ago, Anders Melander said: Well, I got this one during install so I'm already a little bit "excited"... https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/threat/Trojan.Win32.Lazzzy.gen/ Please open an issue on https://qp.embarcadero.com and say what version of Kaspersky you use. Edited Wednesday at 05:23 PM by Patrick PREMARTIN Share this post Link to post
Lars Fosdal 1902 Posted Wednesday at 05:57 PM I thought everyone had dropped Kaspersky by now. Share this post Link to post