Jump to content
Tommi Prami

Delphi bug reports or feature requests to "vote"/comment for (important, fatal etc)/

Recommended Posts

Post bug reports or feature requests what you feel need some publicity.

I'll post mine:


Default "styled elements" appears to the inherited form needlessly (into dfm)
https://embt.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/RSS-779

Add Compiler/AST assisted "With remover" refactoring tool
https://embt.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/RSS-1666

SimpleRoundTo returns wrong value
https://embt.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/RSS-1651

-Tee-

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Allow for recursive directory search for units

https://embt.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/RSS-940

These ones are in old system, so they are read only. I wonder should I copy these ones to new one?

Add http status code constants to RTL

https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-35731

Add const versions of generic anonymous methods declarations

https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-33336

 

Decouple TService/TServiceApplication from VCL

https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-41813

Add immutable records (similar to C# readonly structs)

https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-34572

Share this post


Link to post
8 hours ago, EugeneK said:

These ones are in old system, so they are read only. I wonder should I copy these ones to new one?

I think you should repost them to new bugtracker, most likely voting on old tracker does nothing anymore, voting/commenting on new might have some benefit :classic_biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
11 hours ago, EugeneK said:

These ones are in old system, so they are read only. I wonder should I copy these ones to new one?

No. Please don't post existing bug reports to the new tracker as they already exist in the internal tracking system and doing so duplicates the issues and only creates more unnecessary work. Also ne tracking system does not support voting. There are zero benefits for anyone involved.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
17 hours ago, Dave Nottage said:

I'm unable to access this one.

Don't know what to do, new system is very primitive, I don't see any options on the page different from other issues that are available to different people.

Share this post


Link to post
55 minutes ago, EugeneK said:

Don't know what to do, new system is very primitive, I don't see any options on the page different from other issues that are available to different people.

I don't know if you can change that now, but when posting issue you need to use Share with Embarcadero customers to make it visible to others. See https://dalijap.blogspot.com/2024/04/delphi-121-new-quality-portal-released.html

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 9/9/2024 at 11:09 PM, Dalija Prasnikar said:

No. Please don't post existing bug reports to the new tracker as they already exist in the internal tracking system and doing so duplicates the issues and only creates more unnecessary work. Also ne tracking system does not support voting. There are zero benefits for anyone involved.

I've seen people going old-school and posting +1 comments 😀

Share this post


Link to post
13 hours ago, EugeneK said:

I've added "Embarcadero Customers" to sharing, so hopefully this helps.

Thanks, that helps and your issue is accessible now.

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Tommi Prami said:

First weirdness in D12.2

ISO8601ToDate('0600-12-31T13:13:13Z') returns wrong value
https://embt.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/RSS-1747

May be there is an evaluation error in the routine with negative TDateTime (less then year 1900 in "System.DateUtils" at  line 3487 ... the operation should be "minus" if the date il older then 1900 ....

 

Value := LDate + LTime;

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, DelphiUdIT said:

May be there is an evaluation error in the routine with negative TDateTime (less then year 1900 in "System.DateUtils" at  line 3487 ... the operation should be "minus" if the date il older then 1900 ....

 


Value := LDate + LTime;

 

Most likely, all failed, at quick glance, where about 1800 or older...

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, Tommi Prami said:

Most likely, all failed, at quick glance, where about 1800 or older...

All dates prior to 1900 will fail.

 

I "simply" copy three routine form System.DateUtils to my implementation uses section (call them with My... like MyISO8601ToDate .....) and change that line.

 

That seem to works.

Edited by DelphiUdIT
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

At least one of my bug reports got resolved in Delphi 12 :classic_cheerleader: partially :classic_unsure::

This no longer happens the same way, but moving from Run to Components using the right arrow key now only highlights the Menu item without showing the menu. Pressing the down arrow key then shows the menu, so I guess I can live with that partial fix. Moving from Edit to Search with the right arrow key works as expected.

 

Unfortunately the two most infuriating bugs since Delphi 11 have still not been fixed:

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Tommi Prami said:

IF possible, check your tickets on the new Jira, that they are visible to others also...

Thanks, done.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

I am kind of surprised that being able to VOTE on a request is not a request.  I thought I came across a post where someone said they put it in as a feature request, but I couldn't see it.  Perhaps it is one of those that went in as private instead of public.

Share this post


Link to post
9 hours ago, Gord P said:

I am kind of surprised that being able to VOTE on a request is not a request.  I thought I came across a post where someone said they put it in as a feature request, but I couldn't see it.  Perhaps it is one of those that went in as private instead of public.

I have created that request:

https://embt.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/RSS-1439

 

They closed it as "Won't do" 😞

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
31 minutes ago, EugeneK said:

To be fair not much they can do, Atlassian blackmailing everyone to move to cloud based Jira, so they have to use inferior system as customer facing.

But still - Emba is customer, I guess they can ask Atlassian to add this functionality, which doesn't look too difficult to implement, does it?

Share this post


Link to post
7 minutes ago, Vandrovnik said:

But still - Emba is customer, I guess they can ask Atlassian to add this functionality, which doesn't look too difficult to implement, does it?

 

There is a comment on the QP:

Quote

Marco Cantu

26/Jul/24 7:06 PM
 

I don’t know, we’d love to surface it. It’s been requested for long time. Also, there were plugins, but not available on cloud hosting. We’ll keep looking for options.

Share this post


Link to post
34 minutes ago, Vandrovnik said:

But still - Emba is customer, I guess they can ask Atlassian to add this functionality, which doesn't look too difficult to implement, does it?

Lol, we had to do the same migration at our company, complained to Atlassian that cloud Jira is super slow compared to old hosted one, their response - our code is very big and complex you should get a faster computer. And our company is much bigger than Embarcadero. Jira is dominating the market and there is no easy migration to something else, there is no reason for them to do anything right now.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×