Leaderboard

Just in time before April fools day 2019 there is the new GExperts release (it’s still 2019-03-30 so you are safe 😉 ). Please be aware that I mostly work with Delphi 2007, so this version can be regarded as tested quite well, followed by Delphi XE2. The others are only known to compile and new features are usually tested superficially with all versions. This is particularly true for Delphi 6/7 and 2005/2006. If you want to help by testing new versions before I release them, please contact me [...] https://blog.dummzeuch.de/2019/03/30/gexperts-1-3-13-experimental-twm-2019-03-30-released/

Then write simple wrappers that do derive from a common base class. Especially if SQL parameter handling is different for both, wrappers are the best choice.

I had to look them up myself, so it took a while but here they are, the changes, bugfixes and improvements between the GExperts 1.3.12 (released 2018-12-22) and 1.3.13 (released yesterday, 2019-03-30😞 https://blog.dummzeuch.de/2019/03/31/changes-between-gexperts-1-3-12-and-1-3-13/

The easiest way to detect this is to simply send the message and handle the case where SendMessage() fails with an ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED error: "When a message is blocked by UIPI the last error, retrieved with GetLastError, is set to 5 (access denied)." It is not, actually.

I showed this during EKON last year. Unfortunately I couldn't find the time working on it again. It heavily lacks documentation, but perhaps it can serve as a start. https://bitbucket.org/uweraabe/codecoveragemagician

@Stefan Glienke weren't you working on something like that? That is something I'd pay for!

Among a few minor things it allows for a more declarative approach of writing tests by using attributes to provide the test data. In a classic DUnit test if you have to test an algorithm with 20 different value combinations you need to write 20 tests (either as different methods or by putting them into one test). However DUnit can be pimped to allow the same so you don't need to migrate (*) - since DUnit is kinda abandoned development wise Vincent decided to roll his own library instead of modifying and possibly cleaning up the code from DUnit which dates way back. (*) I did that way back even before DUnitX existed: https://stackoverflow.com/a/9006662/587106 and later also put that into a unit of Spring4D. As you can see in the screenshot you have multiple tests shown although there is only one method declared the extension takes care of producing them so you can run them individually (if for example certain data produces a failure) while you are fixing it. Another thing (which personally never bothered me much) is that with DUnitX you can write testcase classes without inheriting from a base class (this can also be done with an extension for DUnit - did it but never put it anywhere because it was not useful for me). The last thing that I remember is the fact that DUnitX can do is have fixture setup/teardown - they only run once even if there are multiple tests in the class - classic DUnit runs Setup/TearDown methods before and after every single test - guess what? You can also plug that onto DUnit. My personal opinion: do automated unit tests but it does not matter what framework you are using. I use DUnit with the before mentioned extensions and we do so at work because its powerful and compact. And regardless which one you are using - use them with TestInsight and make them part of your CI. 😉