Leaderboard

Delphi is notoriously without any public timelines. They have on occasion published very vague outlooks, but AFAIK no public roadmaps of any reasonable detail exist. During their last release webinar it was Ian, I believe, who suggested this is entirely due to Idera's policies. The old excuse about different countries having different laws about forward-looking statements was mentioned in that context, if I am not mistaken. One wonders how other technology companies with far deeper pockets (hence, bigger targets for lawyers) are able to make all sorts of roadmaps and timelines. I wouldn't blame anyone working on Delphi for the lack of a roadmap, but it's still kind of a running joke for the last decade or more... Prior attempts at Windows on ARM were complete failures, but this one is obviously going to stick, and has nothing in common with Microsoft's previous attempts. I have a Snapdragon Windows PC and it's definitely "for real this time." I don't see any reason why Delphi shouldn't offer Windows on ARM as a compiler target.

2024 called and wants its news back

In this post, I'll share all the workarounds I use when LSP fails, which have greatly helped me during coding. Hopefully, you'll find them useful before Embarcadero completely fixes the LSP Server, which I'm sure will be soon. I'll also mention GExperts throughout this post, as it includes some useful features that can speed up using the tools listed below. Delphi Uses Helper Link: https://delphisorcery.blogspot.com/2021/03/introducing-delphi-uses-helper.html Feature: proper replacement for the Find Unit... refactor (Ctrl+Shift+A) feature. Description This has been by far the most helpful plugin. It's as simple as typing the name of a type and pressing Ctrl+Shift+A to find the unit where it's declared. When the window pops up, you can press Enter to add the unit to the uses section (use the left/right arrows to switch between interface and implementation sections), or press Shift+Enter to open the unit and jump to the line where the type is declared. GExperts bonus: The IDE already has a similar feature under the Refactor menu with the same shortcut, Ctrl+Shift+A, but it doesn’t work well and is certainly not as fast as Delphi Uses Helper. However, sometimes the default feature will trigger instead of the plugin (e.g., when pressing the shortcut without any text at the caret position). To remove the default shortcut, use GExperts' IDE Menu Shortcuts: find the shortcut under Refactor > Find Unit... (it should be the last one), and assign it to another key. MMX - Show Related Classes Link: https://www.mmx-delphi.de/ Feature: shows ancestor class, implemented interfaces, and sibling classes for a given class. Description Want to quickly navigate to a class’s ancestor or interface, or find out which siblings it has? This feature gives you exactly that, neatly and efficiently. To use it, right-click and go to MMX Commands > Navigate and Move > Show Related Classes. Or even better, map a shortcut by going to MMX > Properties > Key Bindings and finding Show Related Classes. I’ve personally mapped it to Shift+Alt+3. MMX - Open Unit... Link: https://www.mmx-delphi.de/ Feature: displays searchable units based on set configuration. Description Quickly displays all units based on your configuration. The configuration allows for adding units from the currently opened project or project group, and the following paths: Project Search path, IDE Library path, and IDE Browsing path. Find Original Symbol Feature: additional help navigating to a unit, type, or method. Description Using Find Declaration (Ctrl+Click) is known to fail occasionally, especially on bigger projects. What I've found helpful at times is to try using the Find Original Symbol that's located under the Search > Find Symbols menu item. I've personally mapped the Find Declaration to Ctrl+< and the Find Original Symbol to Ctrl+Shift+< through the GExperts IDE Menu Shortcuts, and I spam them when needed. It does help sometimes. Add a shortcut to the Reload LSP Server menu item Link: https://github.com/havrlisan/zx-idetools/blob/main/Source/Zx.IT.KeyBinding.ReloadLSPServer.pas Description In Delphi 12.1, a menu item Reload LSP Server was added under the Tools menu. Before that, you could add a custom tool to manually kill the LSP, and the IDE would restart it automatically. Unfortunately, they didn't add a shortcut for the menu item, so your options are limited to mouse clicks or to clicking Alt > T > accelerated key. Note that the accelerated key will be automatically assigned, and it depends on your menu items under the Tools menu, which sucks because that's the most changeable menu (because of custom tools, or third-party plugins). Usually, I'd use GExperts IDE Menu Shortcuts to manually add the shortcut, but the Reload LSP Server menu item doesn't show up there. After some debugging, I realized that the menu item in question isn't registered on IDE startup, but is loaded sometime after all other packages are loaded. My best guess is that the GExperts remembers the menu items when loaded, and doesn't re-fetch them afterward (I'm too lazy to search through the source code, sorry). So I decided to implement an IDE notifier that listens to a "ProjectGroupOpen" notification and then tries to find the Reload LSP Server menu item and assigns the shortcut to it. I've set the default shortcut to Alt+Shift+W, but the code is quite simple and is easily portable to a package of your own. That's all I've got so far. If you have some other features or tips, feel free to share them in this post!

Indy in general (not just TIdSMTP specifically) indeed natively supports only up to OpenSSL 1.0.2, not OpenSSL 1.1.x and later. This is a LONG standing problem with no resolution in Indy itself at this time. But, there are a few 3rd party implementations available that add support for those versions, such as TaurusTLS: https://github.com/JPeterMugaas/TaurusTLS

OpenSSL has released a new feature version 3.5.0 (no security fixes). It includes support for new Post Quantum Cryptography (PQC) algorithms (ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA) and for server side QUIC (RFC 9000). ICS has no plans for QUIC support, not yet investigated PQC, don't believe any low level changes are needed, maybe changes to the cipher lists. There are other TLS/SSL changes due for IVS V9.5, so will investigate shortly. This is a long term support release with fixes and security updates for five years, until April 2030. Windows binaries are available in SVN and the overnight zip file and separately from https://wiki.overbyte.eu/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download or https://www.magsys.co.uk/delphi/magics.asp In addition to the three DLL files, the zips include compiled RES resource files that contain the same DLLs, text files and version information, see the RC file. The RES file may be linked into application EXE files and code then used to extract the DLLs from the resource to a temporary directory to avoid distributing them separately. ICS V9.1 and later optionally support loading the resource file. These OpenSSL versions are included with ICS V9.5 beta available from SVN and the overnight zip. ICS V9.5 beta now defaults to using OpenSSL 3.5.0, provided the new OverbyteIcsDefs.inc files is installed, or you undefine OpenSSL_35 and suppress an earlier version. . Angus

JetPascal is a new code assistant for Delphi developers. Our goal is to be a fast, reliable, and intelligent code assistant for Delphi developers, supporting both RAD Studio and Visual Studio Code. The product is still in early stages. The current Insiders version includes these navigation and search features (inspired by Visual Studio Code) for Delphi XE7-12.3. Go to File Go to Project Go to Line Go to Symbol in Editor Delphi Source File VCL/FMX Form Go to Symbol in Workspace Go to Definition Go to Type Definition Go to Base Symbols Go to Derived Symbols Go to Implementation Go to Containing Declaration Peek Definition A few demos: - Go to Symbol in Source Editor - Go to Symbol in Form Editor (Go to component, property, and event in form designer.) - Go to Implementation To see the more demos, the status, and the roadmap of the product, please visit JetPascal page. You can also try it by download the Insiders version. Early Bird Program We are offering special Early Bird Price—significantly below the upcoming standard rate—while we finalize key features. This offer applies to both Commercial and Personal subscriptions and is open to new users now. Note: Legacy CodeInsightPlus customers can request our standard renewal price throughout 2025.

Windows on ARM does not need to unseat two entrenched ecosystems to be successful like Windows Phone did. There is no comparison. Most of the people buying a Windows computer do not need to care if the CPU is ARM or x64. On the flip side, however, since ARM-based Windows machines run x64 apps just fine, there is no real pressure on Embarcadero to rush offering a compiler.

Microsoft has done several attempts at Windows on ARM for over a decade and they have all been total failures. Anybody who targeted it ended up wasting a lot of time and money. The most recent effort does have two things previous attempts didn't: full win32 API support and the ability to run x86 binaries. That alleviates the need for application developers to produce ARM binaries until Windows on ARM gains some traction as a platform. Adding support before the platform gains some traction is unwise. We are in fool me once, fool me twice, fool me three times territory for Windows on ARM.

I don't know what research RDP did (probably asking some GenAI ), but Spring4d does not contain thread-safe collections - for those needs, refer to libraries such as OTL or protect them by primitives in your own code according to your use-cases. I don't step into that territory because you cannot simply make general-purpose collections thread-safe. It already starts with simple things like: how do you protect a list where one thread adds/removes items and another iterates over it? It then requires a different API, and it's complex to design a general-purpose thread-safe collection library because everyone has their use cases, which you cannot simply combine.

In other news, Lazarus, the North Korean hacker group has released a statement saying it would be better for them if people would please click on the link in that email ebay has just just sent them asking to update their account details. "There's too much mistrust in the world today" said Park Jin Hyok, a spokeperson for Lazarus. "Just click it, godammit".

I am not implying anything or accusing you. Still, in the age of supply chain attacks and smuggling malicious code into open source repositories, anyone that blindly trusts some binary code they cannot build from source is acting grossly negligent.

For Delphi / RAD Studio version 12.3, the original solution provided by Jim:  C:\> getitcmd -i=fmxlinux-12-1.78 works "out of the box" with no issues !! ( --> no "patch" needed as in 12.2 ) You can use this solution to get "FMX Linux" until they reach a final agreement with Kryukov's state ...

Hi In general FMX works like the VCL for desktop platforms. The main differences are : - positions are single instead of integer (position.x, position.y instead of Top/Left) - Text replace Caption property everywhere (instead of for a TForm) - each visual component is a container - many more alignments than for VCL components - the components are styled and can be completely changed with styles (but don't try that to start). - no TDBxxx components, use LiveBindings to link data to visual components - for macOS the first option of the TMainMenu is fusion with macOS App menu, add an empty one (and hide/remove in FormCreate it if its not macOS) if you want the classic "file" option To debug / deploy to macOs you need a Mac available locally or on Internet and PAServer installed on it. I've done many things on FireMonkey with a lot of open source projects on GitHub (not only games 😉 ). Replay videos (in French) of my Twitch live coding streams are available, but you can check this series (the page is in French, the videos are in English) : https://apprendre-delphi.fr/coding-bootcamp-2023.html To the books list I had the "Delphi Programming Projects" from William Duarte. For other samples then the ones available with Delphi you have this code repository https://github.com/FMXExpress/Cross-Platform-Samples and some others I've listed on https://github.com/DeveloppeurPascal/Delphi-samples/blob/main/OtherDelphiSampleRepositories.md If you have a first project to create, give us some tips, we will find the available resources around it.

I've just got this working with new types Socket_Address = record { V9.5 used to store an IPv4 or IPv6 address } Sockaddr: PSockAddrIn6; SockaddrLength: Integer; end; TSocketAddress = Socket_Address; CSADDR_INFO = record { V9.5 used to connection IP information } LocalAddr: TSocketAddress; { family, address and port } RemoteAddr: TSocketAddress; iSocketType: Integer; { SOCK_STREAM or SOCK_DGRAM } iProtocol: Integer; { IPPROTO_TCP or IPPROTO_UDP } Buffer: array[0..64] of Byte; { space for PSockAddrIn6 records } end; TCSAddrInfo = CSADDR_INFO; Need to ensure it handles all ways of connecting, and update a sample to show the result, hopefully later today. Angus

I don't have any of the mentioned above IDEs, but i see a problem or two .. well more than that a lot, but will talk about your exact problem first 1) The directives are wrong and mixed, and here how they should look like function TRandom.Next(Bits: Integer): UInt32; begin {$IFOPT R+} {$DEFINE HasRangeChecks} {$ENDIF} {$IFOPT Q+} {$DEFINE HasOverflowChecks} {$ENDIF} {$RANGECHECKS OFF} {$OVERFLOWCHECKS OFF} FSeed := (FSeed * CMultiplier + CIncrement); Result := UInt32(FSeed shr (64 - Bits)); // Use the highest bits; Lower bits have lower period. {$IFDEF HasRangeChecks} {$RANGECHECKS ON} {$ENDIF} {$IFDEF HasOverflowChecks} {$OVERFLOWCHECKS ON} {$ENDIF} end; Because we have two overflow check can be triggered here, not one !, Integer overflow range overflow come from multiplication and form truncation while mixing signed and unsigned, both need to be disabled, also the R+ for the range while wrongly was Q. 2) I tried this small test procedure RunTest; var Rand: IRandom; A, B, C: BigInteger; begin Rand := TRandom.Create($FF00FE01FD02FC03); // sooner ! Trigger overflow check at TRandomBase.NextBytes //Rand := TRandom.Create($FF00FF01FF02FF03); // Trigger overflow check at TRandom.Next A.Create(1024, Rand); B.Create(1024, Rand); C := A * C; Writeln('A = ' + A.ToHexString); Writeln('B = ' + B.ToHexString); Writeln('C = ' + C.ToHexString); end; And we have another place that has an overflow, but the fix is easy (again sign bit!!) procedure TRandomBase.NextBytes(var Bytes: array of Byte); var Head, Tail: Integer; N, {Rnd,} I: Integer; Rnd : UInt32; // <--- fix overflow begin Didn't go through more tests or any deeper in digging into the source. Now to the other problems 3) This pseudorandom number generator is not cryptographically secure , it has very small duration and depend on single modular operation which is 2^(64-Bits)= 2^k, this can't be considered secure it is as predictable as it can be by design, but choosing 2^k make brute force algorithm for it way much faster ! 4) I don't understand from where the assumption of only 48 bits are only used, this is strange and out of the context or this family of PRNG, may be i missed something with Bits, but will not dig deeper in it. 5) the core problem is depending on Int64, this is signed and by using signed we lose a bit and confuse the compiler and math, while gains nothing in return, this family of PRNG which call LCG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_congruential_generator doesn't handle signed numbers, and doesn't need as it is by definition, so using Int64 should be replaced with UInt64 for the constants, and the algorithm too. 6) tried to figure out this code You are going with Karatsuba https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karatsuba_algorithm , nice it is the right way when you are in the corner, also much cleaner for limbs, yet the last masking is again wrong assuming (you are following the original code) it can or should be signed operation, this should be changed to unsigned, and return the sign bit to the fold, as it is by design is using the highest 32 bit, by losing the sign, where entropy is lost, we left with 31 bit randomness. About learning and implementing RSA, yes do it and you will learn much, and i wish you good luck, also a suggestion : why not read more about CSPRNG and implement one ,a cryptographically secure (CS) one, there is one i liked very much due it speed and portability, it is based on CHAHCA with reduced rounds called ChaCha8, it use the same permutation as ChaCha20 but with 8 rounds, it is secure and small as it can be, and used in Go Lang applications extensively, anyway it is not so important and most important thing is understanding is that security is like a chain and the chain is weak as its weakest link, randomness is always the most crucial link that when break (insecure) it will render everything built on it insecure, and last suggestion if you are going to use you own implementation of RSA in production for clients then test it then test it and test it again and think a lot before using your own implementation, it is not recommended by anyone ( as i think you read again and again, things like don't implement your own...), but you should learn it inside out, so go with it.

Update I did a massive re-haul of the code. Now works much much better and it recognizes way more VCL components.

You can reserve a video against embedding, so that might be a factor?

No, I don't see the point -- there are already so many people who actually do hardware comparisons for a living writing about it. Aside from commenting here in the context of a Delphi developer, I don't have time to write my experience in detail. I will just add this: I bought a Snapdragon Windows PC when I saw that users of my software were installing it on Snapdragon Windows PCs, but that the 32-bit version of my software was appearing instead of the 64-bit. I quickly realized this was due to how the Inno Setup script was written, which assumed that if x64 was not available that the system needed the 32-bit x86 binaries installed. Inno added support for some additional scripting functions to better handle this and I wanted to test my software on Snapdragon so I bought one and fixed the install script. That works perfectly. And now any time I need to grab a portable PC I take the Snapdragon one because its the lightest Windows PC I have and the one with the best battery life. I've had no issues doing what I need to do on it. This is not some cheesy WinRT netbook from 12 years ago that can only open a web browser and play Candy Crush and run Office apps. This is the Windows answer to an Apple MacBook (which I have two of also).

This just underlines that GenAI and copyright is a delicate thing

Anybody remember OS/2? They had great support for running DOS and Windows 16 bit programs. So nobody bothered to write any native OS/2 programs. Guess what happened when Windows went 32 bits? (OK, that was not the only reason for OS/2's demise, but a big part of it.)

As always: Into the pockets of the parent company Idera. It's called a "Gewinnabführungsvertrag" in Germany. On the other hand how do you know that there are millions of Delphi users? And more importantly: Do you know that they have paid for a license recently? Maybe 99% of these supposed millions are still using Delphi 5 or 7?

Putting the actual functionality into a res file where you are loading it from at startup looks very sus, to say the least.

Continuing with the "funny" compiler "errors": 1. Optional semicolon (for global and nested proc declarations only!!!) if you have any of these specifiers (platform, deprecated, assembler, register, stdcall... etc): But semicolon is required if this is a const/var/type/method 2. Crazy mixing of these specifiers (you can mix all these specifiers as you want): 3. Crazy mixing of "platform" specifier for global variable declaration: I suppose there are much more similar "bugs", I see it on 11.3 and 12.3, and believe emba will never fix it, their favorite answer - don't do like this! 😄

I would go back to Vista or Win 7 in blink of an eye. I would be thrilled if I could have stayed on Win 10, too. Windows 11 is by far the worst Windows version ever (and I could not believe this was possible after Windows 8). There are zero new features I want to have and they messed up everything else. For start half of the things no longer cannot be configured. Taskbar height is too big, colors and icons are awful, Windows theme even worse (selection colors, checkboxes, and similar), you need ten clicks more to do things, fonts are total nightmare and cannot be uninstalled. Whoever designed that Cascadia Mono font needs to be tarred and feathered. It is absolutely illegible and half of the websites are using is as the default monospace font. And this is just scratching the surface...

Thank you! I would never do that. Disagreement does not imply lack of respect. It was not meant to bother you. This is why I also put a smiley at the end of my sentence. The point was to bring attention to your posts which are hard to read because of your AI usage. AI can be helpful, especially for communication and I know people who are able to communicate their thoughts better with the help of AI. However, that involves using AI very lightly and mostly for translating and fixing text they actually wrote. When you give AI more freedom to write things for you, the effects will commonly be the opposite. I am finding your posts where you used AI extremely hard to read. They are long and unnecessarily wordy. Another problem (not that relevant here and now) is that when one can clearly recognize something being AI generated more than having some light AI touches, one cannot be sure whether you are actually discussing something with a person or merely an AI. Are the points and arguments used really the ones that the person has tried to make or it is just something AI put there? It is hard to have a conversation in such situations. Nobody is trying to prevent anyone from using AI. You are free to use it all you like. I am not sure what you mean by spying or using third party tools. I am neither spying on you, nor I am using any tools for AI detection. As a Stack Overflow moderator, I have seen first hand the huge amount of damage AI can cause. The amount of posted AI answers there (where vast majority of them are completely incorrect AI slop) is not measured in thousands. It is measured in tens and hundreds of thousands. There are users who posted hundreds and even thousands AI answers. Imagine how much more of such posts would be there if AI would be allowed there. The site would be overflowed with AI. The only reason why AI is forbidden there is to preserve the site as repository of knowledge and a place where you can go and get help from actual experts in their field. Unfortunately, the only means moderators have to fight such influx of AI answers is to remove all and every one where some AI usage is detected (even when it is used merely for translating). We cannot easily distinguish between post which were fully AI generated and ones that were merely improved by AI. On the scale of Stack Overflow, with only handful of moderators removing AI, we cannot judge the correctness of each and every answer. Unfortunately, it would. You cannot add feature without removing the time needed to do implement said feature, from something else. That means less improvements in already used frameworks (VCL and FMX), less bug fixes, less IDE improvements. Embarcadero is not Microsoft, nor Apple, nor Google. They need to pick what they will do carefully to maximize benefits to all customers, which means focusing on the things that cannot be easily provided by 3rd party.